|

POSTED 01 AUGUST, 2003
What Does "Under the Law" Really Mean?
by
J.K. McKee
editor@tnnonline.net
Those of you who have been in the Messianic community for any
elongated period of time know that we can be a
controversial group of people.[1]
Those of us who were raised in mainstream
Christianity and have now joined Messianic
congregations have questioned much of what we
were taught in the past, testing it against
Scripture. While today’s Christianity did indeed
give us a foundational grounding in the Word of
God, and thankfully and gratefully
presented us the gospel of salvation available
in Yeshua the Messiah (Jesus Christ), it is
nevertheless a human religious system, and as
such did present us with some non-Biblical
teachings.
One of the errant teachings of much of contemporary Christianity,
which has re-arisen in the past few years as the
Messianic movement has gotten larger, is the
belief that Yeshua the Messiah came to abolish
the Torah or the Law of Moses. Those of us who
have entered into the Messianic community of
faith do not believe this to be true. We
evidence this in our lives by now practicing
many of the things that Christianity has deemed
unimportant for the Body of Messiah, but were
adhered to and kept by Yeshua’s early followers.
We keep the seventh-day Sabbath or Shabbat,
we celebrate the appointed times of Leviticus
23, and we follow the kosher dietary laws. These
are just a few Torah practices that most
Christians believe are unimportant.[2]
Now this I do not choose, as some in the Messianic
community do: to vehemently criticize, berate,
and harass Christians who do not feel the same
way as I do about these issues. I have taken my
fair share of negative comments and realize that
some are not ready to hear or receive the
message. All things happen in the Lord’s timing,
and much more unites Christians and Messianics
than divides them (Ephesians 4:1-6). Yet one of
the reasons why there can be problems between
Christians and Messianics is because many
Messianics do not know how to properly defend
their faith and practice. Rather than examining
Scripture, insulting terms are usually thrown
around and fights ensue. This is most evident
when Christians who oppose Torah obedience claim
that we are “under the Law”—and that this is not
a position in which born again Believers should
want to find themselves. Sadly, in my opinion,
much of the Messianic handling of this one
phrase has been anything but proper. We must be
able to properly respond to this and see
how it is used in the New Testament.
This article addresses the clause “under the Law” (Grk. hupo
nomon,
upo nomon), how it is used, and what it means in
its appropriate context in view of what both the
Tanach and Apostolic Scriptures tell us about
the significance of God’s Torah. We will examine
Yeshua’s words on the matter of the Law of
Moses. We will examine how a variety of
Christians and Messianic teachers have handled
this term. We will then test these claims
against what the Apostle Paul says in his
letters. When you finish reading, the next time
a Christian says that you as a Messianic are
errantly “under the Law,” you should be able to
properly respond to his claim.
Blessings and Curses
Before we examine the phrase “under the Law,” it is imperative that
we understand the importance that the Torah is
to play in the lives of God’s people. Should its
instructions continue to guide God’s people
today?
Our Heavenly Father says in Deuteronomy 7:6, “For
you are a holy people to the
Lord
your God; the
Lord
your God has chosen you to be a people for His
own possession out of all the peoples who are on
the face of the earth.” The Hebrew word qodesh (vdq)
specifically means, “apartness,
sacredness, holiness”
(BDB).[3]
God’s people are supposed to be separate from
all the other peoples of the world. Ancient
Israel was to do this by keeping God’s
commandments that were contained in His
Instruction, the Torah:
“The
Lord
will establish you as a holy people to Himself,
as He swore to you, if you keep the commandments
of the
Lord your God and walk in His ways. So
all the peoples of the earth will see that you
are called by the name of the
Lord,
and they will be afraid of you. The
Lord
will make you abound in prosperity, in the
offspring of your body and in the offspring of
your beast and in the produce of your ground, in
the land which the
Lord
swore to your fathers to give you”
(Deuteronomy 28:9-11).
If Israel is faithful to obey God, then His people are promised by
Him to be established as a holy people, and it
will lead to their greatness. The Hebrew verb
qum (~Wq) appears in the Hifil stem (casual action,
active voice) and has a variety of possible
applications in this text, including: “cause
to arise, raise,”
“fig. raise (to dignity, power),” and “erect,
build” (BDB).[4]
This is an indication that if Israel keeps the
commandments that it will become a great people
and be blessed by the Lord. Deuteronomy 4:5-6
specifically says,
“See,
I have taught you statutes and judgments just as
the Lord
my God commanded me, that you should do thus in
the land where you are entering to possess it.
So keep and do them, for that is your
wisdom and your understanding in the sight of
the peoples who will hear all these statutes and
say, ‘Surely this great nation is a wise and
understanding people.’”
Notice that by Israel’s obeying the Torah, it would be said of them
that “Only a wise and understanding people is
this great nation” (Alter). If Israel obeyed the
Lord, the people would be blessed by Him—and
being blessed by Him they would serve as a
testimony to outsiders of His goodness. If there
is anything that we need today, it is wise
people who know Yeshua as Savior and can
understand God’s Word with the power of the Holy
Spirit—being examples of those blessed by Him!
Deuteronomy 4:6 is a significant statement of
mission and purpose. God’s people need to be
able to discern things based on Scripture, and
possess the ability to share His wisdom with
others.
But what if the people did not heed the words of God’s Torah, and
instead chose to disobey Him? Before Moses’
death at the end of Deuteronomy, the assembly of
Israel is instructed to go to Mounts Ebal and
Gerizim. They are to be divided up, with twelve
distinct blessings and curses to be pronounced
upon the tribes (Deuteronomy 27:1-26). They are
to end with a final word: “‘Cursed
is he who does not confirm the words of this law
by doing them.’ And all the people shall say,
‘Amen’” (Deuteronomy 27:26).
This is not a light usage of Amein (!ma), or “verily, truly” (BDB).[5]
The people of Israel are told that if they do
not allow God’s Torah to be upheld and
established as their ruling principles, that
they will be cursed because of their sin and
disobedience. In their being cursed, they would
find themselves subject to the Torah’s
penalties. Their answer to God’s request is
so be it.
Scriptural history and the nature of fallen humanity show us that
Ancient Israel was not faithful in keeping the
Torah. In fact, both the Lord and Moses knew
this would happen. Deuteronomy chs. 29 and 30
detail the judgment and curses that would
manifest because of disobedience.[6]
However, even though Ancient Israel was once
disobedient to the Torah, there are still
blessings to be gained by following it. As Paul
taught, “Therefore
did that which is good become a cause of
death for me? May it never be! Rather it was
sin” (Romans 7:13a). The Torah is something that
is “spiritual” (Romans 7:14), and “We know that
the law is good if one uses it properly” (1
Timothy 1:8, NIV).
Our Heavenly Father gave His people the Torah and its commandments
to demonstrate His love for us, and His desire
to watch out for us. Because of the love we
should have toward Him, we should naturally want
to follow what He has told us to do—especially
as its commandments form the basis of proper
ethics and morality. As Moses’ Teaching details,
“Now,
Israel, what does the
Lord
your God require from you, but to fear the
Lord
your God, to walk in all His ways and love Him,
and to serve the
Lord
your God with all your heart and with all your
soul, and to keep the
Lord’s
commandments and His statutes which I am
commanding you today for your good?”
(Deuteronomy 10:12-13).
The Lord says that His commandments are l’tov lakha (%l
bAjl), “for your benefit” (ATS) or
“well-being” (NRSV). The Torah was not given as
something to place God’s people into legalistic
bondage or be a yoke to them, but rather to
provide them the best way to succeed on Planet
Earth, both spiritually and physically.
God certainly did not free Ancient Israel from
Egyptian bondage via the Exodus, only to later
guide them to Mount Sinai and place them in
bondage to the Law!
Of course, over the centuries since Moses was given the task of
teaching the Torah to Ancient Israel, there was
disobedience to it. After the people entered
into the Promised Land, there were struggles
with how to implement the Torah, including a
period of anarchy (Judges 17:6). Israel was at
its peak during the reigns of Kings David and
Solomon, yet because of Solomon’s idolatry and
disobedience to the Torah, the Kingdom split.
The Northern Kingdom of Israel/Ephraim was
besieged, with many taken captive by Assyria
because of its disobedience and idolatry. The
Southern Kingdom of Judah was taken into
Babylonian exile, for seventy years, likewise
because of its disobedience and idolatry.
Upon their return, the Jewish exiles made it a
point to teach the Torah publicly (Nehemiah
7:73-8:12). The Jewish people have taken the
Torah very seriously because of past judgment
incurred from disobedience. When Israel is fully
restored in the Last Days, there will once again
be a return to God’s Torah as the New Covenant
is implemented completely (i.e., Jeremiah
31:31-34; Ezekiel 36:26-27).[7]
And we are also told that the Torah will go
forth from Zion to the nations (Isaiah 2:3;
Micah 4:2). In our day, we are witnessing
non-Jewish Believers in Yeshua embracing their
Hebraic Roots and taking the Torah very
seriously, as these prophecies begin to manifest
themselves. This, as you can imagine, is causing
quite a stir.
What did Yeshua say?
By the time Yeshua walked the Earth, there were
various parties in the Jewish community that
approached the Torah differently. The two
parties most featured in the Apostolic
Scriptures are the Pharisees and Sadducees. The
Sadducees only accepted the Written Torah,
Genesis-Deuteronomy, as being relevant
Scripture, and did not regard what is considered
the rest of the Tanach (Old Testament), or the
Prophets and Writings, as applicable. As a
result, they had a very limited view of the
world and did not believe in the resurrection of
the dead, angels, demons, or miracles.[8]
The Pharisees, in contrast, considered the
entire Tanach as applicable Scripture, and they
believed in the resurrection, angels, demons,
and miracles. But they also believed in the
validity of the Oral Torah or Oral Law, which
composed various traditions carried down over
the centuries which gave explanation to the
commandments. This Oral Law was later written in
the 200s C.E. and is what we now largely know as
the Mishnah.[9]
The Pharisees and the Sadducees made up the
religious council known as the Sanhedrin.
Many people who read the Apostolic Scriptures or
New Testament believe that the Pharisees were
all antagonists against Yeshua. Of course, many
of them were, but so were many Sadducees. Yet at
the same time, many other of His followers were
Pharisees—and Yeshua’s theology and that of His
Disciples was closer to that of the Pharisees
than that of the Sadducees. In fact, the Apostle
Paul did indeed proclaim before the Sanhedrin,
ani P’rush (vWrP
yna,
UBSHNT) or egō Pharisaios eimi (egw
Farisaioß eimi)—“I
am a Pharisee” (Acts 23:6). Surprisingly to some
Paul does not say, “I was a
Pharisee.”
If you have an understanding of the First Century times in which
Yeshua lived, and have committed yourself to
Torah study, you will have a better background
than most who read the Gospel narratives.
William L. Lane indicates how often “NT
statements critical of Judaism have to be
interpreted within the context of intramural
conflicts among Jews in the first century. These
conflicts were rooted in divergent attitudes
toward the Torah and halakhah.”[10]
So, you are likely to discover that when Yeshua
debates with the Pharisees, it is most often
over Torah interpretation and
application—internal debates—not doing
away with God’s commandments as is often viewed.
So what were Yeshua’s words on the matter of the Torah? Consider
what He says in Matthew 5:17-19 in His Sermon on
the Mount:
“Do
not think that I came to abolish the Law or the
Prophets; I did not come to abolish but to
fulfill. For truly I say to you, until heaven
and earth pass away with, not the smallest
letter or stroke shall pass from the Law until
all is accomplished. Whoever then annuls one of
the least of these commandments, and teaches
others to do the same, shall be called
least in the kingdom of heaven; but whoever
keeps and teaches them, he shall be
called great in the kingdom of heaven.”
These three verses of Scripture are of significant importance for
those of us who believe that Yeshua is the
Messiah and that He is the Word of God made
flesh (John 1:14)—meaning that by living a
perfect life He followed the Torah perfectly and
is without sin. Because Yeshua is our example
for living, all Scripture regarding the Torah
must be interpreted through His words. The
Apostle Paul concurs, “Whoever
teaches” must “agree with the sound words of our
Lord Jesus Christ” (1 Timothy 6:3, NRSV).
No matter how hard it may seem to be, or how
unpopular it may be, common claims that the
Torah has been done away and that it is no
longer relevant for today must be reconciled
to Yeshua’s words. That is, if Yeshua’s
words are indeed final.
So what is Yeshua communicating? When the Messiah says, “Do
not think that I came to abolish the Law or the
Prophets,”
He is telling us that His mission is not
to do away with the Law of Moses, contrary to
what some Bible teachers may think. The Greek
verb translated here as “abolish” is kataluō
(kataluw),
meaning, “to end the effect or validity of
someth., put an end to” (BDAG).[11]
He
says quite clearly “Think not that I am come to destroy the law, or
the prophets” (KJV).
Yeshua tells us what His precise intention was regarding the Torah:
“I did not come to abolish, but to fulfill.” The
Greek verb plēroō (plhrow)
means “to
make full, to fill, to fill up,”
“to carry into effect, bring to realization,
realize” (Thayer).[12]
What this means is that in “fulfilling” the
Torah, Yeshua came to live it properly as our
example, how we are to “Let your light shine
before men in such a way that they may see your
good works, and glorify your Father who is in
heaven” (Matthew 5:16). Many do not agree with
this, and instead think that the Messiah
“fulfilled” the Torah only in a prophetic sense,
thus abolishing it, and that it is not relevant
to be followed today. But “fulfill” is by
no means a synonym for abolish! Yeshua’s
next words indicate the correct context of the
passage and what He intends His followers to
understand:
“For truly I say to you, until heaven and earth
pass away, not the smallest letter or stroke
shall pass from the Law until all is
accomplished.”
This verse is confusing for some readers, because the KJV says
“till all be fulfilled.” However, the verb
translated as “fulfilled” in the KJV of v. 18 is
not plēroō, which is used in v. 17, but
is rather gignomai (gignomai),
“to become” (Thayer).[13]
“Fulfilled” is a misleading translation, because
what the Messiah actually says is that until
all is accomplished the smallest letter and
stroke, or “jot and tittle” (KJV) of the Torah,
will not pass away.
The Lord makes a reference to Heaven and Earth passing away before
the Torah passes away. Are Heaven and Earth
still here? Yes. So why do we have those who say
that the Torah is no longer for today? Have they
somehow missed it?
We know that the validity and relevance of the Torah continues to
this day, as Yeshua concludes His remarks with
the following:
“Whoever
then annuls one of the least of these
commandments, and teaches others to do
the same, shall be called least in the kingdom
of heaven; but whoever keeps and teaches them,
he shall be called great in the kingdom of
heaven” (Matthew 5:18-19).
The Messiah attaches eschatological rewards to those who keep the
commandments of the Torah and teach them to
others, and eschatological penalties to those
who do not keep the commandments and teach
others to break them. The word “least” or
elachistos (elacistoß) is of extreme importance. AMG defines
this as, “The least, minimal in magnitude,” “in
number and quantity,” “in rank or dignity,” “in
weight or importance.”[14]
What does this mean? Does it mean that many who
have taught that the Torah is no longer to be
followed are going to be given few rewards in
God’s Kingdom?[15]
It is not our place as humans to judge the
(eternal) status of anyone, but we must heed the Lord’s
words and endeavor to follow His admonition.[16]
The Torah was given to God’s people to be a blessing. Those who
follow His Torah and obey its commandments are
to experience the rewards of obedience. Those
who disregard the Torah and disobey its
commandments will be penalized and/or cursed. In
today’s vernacular, we might say that the Torah
can either be your “best friend” or your “worst
enemy.” As Believers, we are indeed forgiven of
our sin should we fall (1 John 1:9)—but we are
to strive not to sin. The Apostle John
writes, “The
one who keeps His commandments abides in Him,
and He in him. We know by this that He abides in
us, by the Spirit whom He has given us”
(1 John 3:24).
So how does not being “under the Law” factor into all this?
What Christians Have Said About “Under the Law”
Before we examine the clause “under the Law” from a Messianic
perspective, it is important that we understand
what a great deal of Christian handling of
“under the Law” has concluded, so we can know
what to respond to.
In the New American Standard Bible, 1995 Updated Edition (NASU),
which is a widely used and respected literal
Christian translation, the phrase “under (the)
Law” appears in eleven verses.[17]
(Further on I discuss how some of these verses
cannot be literally translated with “under [the]
Law.”) The example I have chosen to illustrate
the standard Christian interpretation of “under
the Law” is Romans 6:14-15, which says,
“For sin shall not be master over you, for you
are not under law but under grace. What
then? Shall we sin because we are not under
law but under grace? May it never be!” (NASU).
The Bible Knowledge Commentary, New Testament,
edited by Dallas Theological Seminary
theologians John F. Walvoord and Roy B. Zuck,
states that “The mention that believers are
‘under grace’ (v. 14) raised another aberrant
idea that the apostle refuted. The question is,
Shall we sin because we are… under grace
instead of the Law?… Paul’s response was
the same as before (v. 2): By no means!”[18]
This commentary equates being “under the Law” as observing the
Torah, by using the description “under grace
instead of Law.” It concludes that when Paul
says that Believers are “under grace” they are
no longer obligated to follow God’s Torah, but
at the same time that Believers are not
permitted to sin. If one does not follow God’s
Law, is this not a license for sin? Something
has to define sin, right? This commentary only
says, “this can be done by following Paul’s
instructions.”[19]
Certainly while Paul’s letters are important for
anyone who considers the Bible authoritative, is
this enough?
What does the good Apostle himself say in Romans 3:20? “[F]or
through the Law comes the knowledge of
sin.”
The Apostle John further says, “Everyone
who practices sin also practices lawlessness;
and sin is lawlessness”
(1 John 3:4). Sin is violation of God’s
Torah. In 2 Corinthians 6:14 Paul
admonishes, “Do
not be bound together with unbelievers; for what
partnership have righteousness and lawlessness,
or what fellowship has light with darkness?” How can these unbelievers be practitioners of
lawlessness if they are not breaking, whether
knowingly or unknowingly, the Torah of God? All
of humanity is subject to the penalties of
breaking the Law (Romans 3:19b).
Equating “under the Law” as following God’s commandments comes up
short because both the Apostle Paul and Apostle
John testify that sin is defined by God’s Torah,
and they admonish people to avoid lawlessness.
As the Torah demonstrates, if you disobey its
commandments then you will be cursed. If we are
instructed by Paul not to sin, and the
Scriptural definition of sin is defined as
lawlessness or disobedience to God’s Torah—then
Paul is actually telling Believers not to
transgress the Law of Moses, contrary to what
many of today’s Christians may believe.
Christian theologians need to do a better job of examining the
whole of Scripture, especially if they tell us
that Believers are to exclusively follow Paul’s
instructions. When Paul says, “For
this, ‘You
shall not commit adultery, you shall not murder,
you shall not steal, you shall not covet,’
and if there is any other commandment, it is
summed up in this saying, ‘You
shall love your neighbor as yourself’”
(Romans 13:9), he was not just making this stuff
up so to speak. He was quoting directly from
God’s Torah.[20]
And if Paul still upholds the commandments of
the Torah as being valid and relevant
instruction (or at least including valid
instruction) for Believers, then what does
“under the Law” really mean?
The standard Christian interpretation of “under the Law” as being
forced to follow God’s Torah also comes up short
because of the position of unbelievers in this
paradigm. Are unbelievers who have rejected
salvation in the Messiah “under the Law” or are
they “under grace”? Considering that Paul’s
letters were written to regions of the Roman
Empire where the non-Jewish, non-believing
populace were not following the Law of Moses,
this is something that needs to be seriously
considered. Being “under grace” is something
that is only available for those who know
Messiah Yeshua and have been redeemed. Keep
in mind that when one disobeys God’s Torah a
person will face punishment. Would not the
non-believing pagans in the communities to which
Paul was writing be cursed by their sin: their
idolatry, fornication, homosexuality, etc.?
Rather than being under grace, would they not
instead find themselves under the condemnation
of the Law?
If these pagans are not “under grace,” then what are they “under”?
They cannot be “under nothing.” Paul says
in Romans 1:25, concerning the heathen, that “they
exchanged the truth of God for a lie, and
worshiped and served the creature rather than
the Creator.” Romans 1 in its entirety discusses how these people are turned
over to sin. What is the status of these people?
We often do not find a satisfactory answer by
many Bible teachers today.
What Messianics Have Said About “Under the Law”
What has the Messianic handling of the term “under the Law” been?
Those Messianics who believe that Torah
obedience is something to be encouraged in the
Body of Messiah have had a substantial amount of
contemporary Christian teaching relating to the
Law of Moses, that is engrained in the minds of
many, to address. As a result, there are varied
responses as to what “under the Law” really
means.
Most of the Messianics that I have encountered turn to the works of
Messianic Jewish theologian David H. Stern,
author of several books, including the Jewish
New Testament and Jewish New Testament
Commentary. He explains his opinion that the
Greek clause hupo nomon (upo
nomon), which is translated as “under (the) Law” in
most Bibles, more accurately means “in
subjection to the system which results in
perverting the Torah into legalism.”[21]
Using the example of Romans 6:14-15 given above,
he translates these verses,
“For
sin will not have authority over you;
because you are not under legalism but under
grace. Therefore, what conclusion should we
reach? ‘Let's go on sinning, because we're
not under legalism but under grace’? Heaven
forbid!”
(CJB).
Justifying this translation, Stern remarks in his Jewish New
Testament Commentary that “The word twice
translated ‘under,’ upo, means ‘controlled
by’…or ‘in subjection to,’”[22]
which leads him to conclude that the best
translation of nomos (nomoß)
is “legalism,” rather than just “Law” or
“Torah.” While perverting the Torah of God into
legalism is surely something that is wrong,
critics of the Messianic movement have attacked
Stern for subjectively rendering nomos as
“legalism” in some places, and then as “Torah”
in others. While Stern’s works have certainly
helped the Messianic community, it is notable
that his translation is not literal, and thus it
cannot be used as a prime source work in
refuting any anti-Torah attitudes that one may
encounter in today’s New Testament theology.
I believe that many Messianics have misdiagnosed the problem of why
Christians they encounter can be hesitant to
consider a Torah observant lifestyle. Messianic
Jewish authors Ariel and D’vorah Berkowitz
comment in their work Torah Rediscovered,
“First and foremost, the Torah is ‘God’s
teaching.’…The word does not mean ‘law’; it
means ‘teaching.’”[23]
They further state that Bible translators could
not just “break out of their centuries-old
tradition” and “have chosen a translation of
‘law’ where Torah would have been the
accurate translation.”[24]
The root problem of why Christians are hesitant to following the
Torah is said by many Messianics to be that both
torah (hrAT) in the Hebrew Scriptures and nomos (nomoß)
in the Greek Scriptures should be translated as
Torah and not “law.” We should not doubt
that the Hebrew term torah—derived from
the verb yarah (hry), meaning to “throw,
cast,”
“shoot (arrows),” and “direct, teach,
instruct” (BDB)[25]—more
accurately means “Teaching”[26]
or “Instruction,” or just plain “Torah.” There
have been some misunderstandings regarding its
translation as “Law,” and some Christians might
think that God’s Torah is just legalistic rules
and regulations. Yet even with this
clarification explained to various Christians, I
cannot concur that this is the primary problem.
It is only a modern phenomenon whereby the word
“law” has come to have a negative connotation
among Christians, as law and order are
good things. The Jewish Rabbis who translated
the Hebrew Bible into Greek three centuries
before the Messiah thought the same thing, and
thought that nomos, the Greek word for
“law,” was the best rendering for torah.
God’s Torah would be the ruling principles of a
proper society. This carried into the Apostolic
Scriptures. Perhaps if they had known that in
the future “law” would come to have a negative
meaning they would have chosen something else,
but we have to live with their decision.
To diagnose the translation of torah as
nomos or “law” as being the primary
problem is not proper, especially when the term
“law” is used frequently in many modern Jewish
Torah commentaries, and even the 1917 Jewish
Press Society version to translate torah.
Modern Jewish teachers do not seem to have a
problem with the term “law” as much as some
Messianics do. And it would not even occur to
most Christian translators to possibly render nomos as “Torah” in English
versions of the New Testament.
The primary problem of why many Christians do not want to adopt a
Torah obedient lifestyle is something that many
people are not willing to see, including many in
the Messianic community. (And it certainly gives
me no pleasure to mention it, either.) This
reason is humanity’s inbred desire to disobey
God, which results in sin and being cursed
just as the Torah tells us. Knowledge of God’s
commandments can cause an unredeemed person to
sin (Romans 7:13b), and if not dealt with
assertively, can spread vociferously throughout
a faith community. Consider what Paul wrote in 2
Thessalonians 2:7, “the
mystery of lawlessness is already at work.” This epistle was written in about 50-52 C.E., only
twenty years after the ascension of Yeshua into
Heaven.
By the end of the First Century, lawlessness or disobedience to the
Torah grew to such an extent in parts of the
ekklēsia, that we can understand the Apostle
John’s poignant words where he says, “By
this we know that we have come to know Him, if
we keep His commandments. The one who says, ‘I
have come to know Him,’ and does not keep His
commandments, is a liar, and the truth is not in
him” (1 John 2:3-4). John directly tells His
audience that if they do not follow God’s
commandments, but at the same time claim to know
the Messiah, then they were speaking lies. And,
most soberly for today, we must consider
Yeshua’s own future word: “Because
lawlessness is increased, most people's love
will grow cold” (Matthew 24:12).
We are now in an appropriate position to understand what “under the
Law” really means.
What Scripture Says About “Under the Law”
The phrase “under (the) Law” is used in eleven verses in the NASU,[27]
which is a widely used translation by many
Christians, and is widely respected and used in
the Messianic community as well. We will use the
NASU as our base of comparison for properly
understanding what this means.
In the Greek, the clause correctly rendered as “under (the) Law” is
hupo nomon (upo
nomon).
The preposition hupo (upo),
when appearing with an accusative case noun
(indicating direct object), can mean
“under, below; under the authority of” (CGEDNT).[28]
Nomos
(nomoß)
is defined by AMG as “spoken in the NT
mostly of the Mosaic statutes,”[29]
meaning the Torah. Most thus conclude that
hupo nomon equates to meaning “following the
Law.”
But is this the only way that we can look at the phrase? We will
examine each of the eleven references where
“under (the) Law” is used in the NASU English
text. I have listed them in their most likely
order of composition (Galatians, 1 Corinthians,
Romans). Is it possible for “under the Law”
to not mean being in obedience to God’s
Torah, but instead being subject to the
Torah’s condemnation upon sinners? Let us
find out if this helps us make better sense of
these passages.[30]
Galatians 3:23
“But
before faith came, we were kept in custody
under the law
[hupo nomon,
upo nomon],
being shut up to the faith which was later
to be revealed.”
Galatians 3:23, although usually interpreted that being “in
custody” or “confined” (RSV) pertains to being
Torah obedient, has much greater significance
when viewed from the vantage point that being
“under the Law” means being subject to the
Torah’s penalties pronounced upon sinners.
Galatians 3:23 speaks of the fact that before
our faith in Messiah Yeshua came, we were
“imprisoned and guarded” (NRSV),[31]
a direct consequence of sin. This position of
the Torah changes when we receive Messiah
Yeshua into our lives and receive forgiveness
from our sins. We are released from the bondage
to sin and are no longer “under the law.”
Redeemed Believers are released from the condemnation they once
experienced under the Law, but they are not
released from God’s high standard of holiness.
For born again Believers, the Torah no longer
serves the same purpose as it did prior to their
salvation experience, having once been a harsh
disciplinarian for those on the way to faith
(Galatians 3:24).[32]
Galatians 4:4-5
“But
when the fullness of the time came, God sent
forth His Son, born of a woman, born under
the Law
[genomenon hupo nomon,
genomenon upo nomon],
so that He might redeem those who were under
the Law [hupo nomon exagorasē,
upo nomon exagorash],
that we might receive the adoption as sons.”
These verses are fairly straightforward because we can clearly see
that being “under the Law” means being subject
to the Torah’s penalties or its condemnation
upon sinners.[33]
Yeshua the Messiah came to “redeem those who
were under the Law,” human beings who stood
condemned because of their disobedience to God.
Yeshua entered into the world as a man, to be
sacrificed for us so that the Torah’s curse
could be lifted for all (Galatians 3:13). Via
the power of Yeshua and His atoning work, the
curse of the Law has now been remitted for those
who receive Him into their lives! Not being
“under the Law” is directly tied to the
redemption of human souls.
Galatians 4:21
“Tell me, you who want to be under law
[hupo nomon,
upo nomon],
do you not listen to the law?”
Galatians 4:21 has been a cause of some misunderstanding, because
the meaning of “under the Law” as being subject
to the Torah’s punishments upon sinners is not
often considered. When we understand the complex
situation that Paul addresses in Galatians, it
is not impossible for his admonition here to be
understood in this light, but it does require us
to reorient our approach to his letter. There
was a sect of agitators in Galatia that said if
you did not follow their “works of law,” being
circumcised and converting to Judaism, that you
could not be included among God’s people.[34]
Some expositors have thought that these
agitators could have been using a platform of
Torah observance to promote errant teachings
related to Jewish mysticism,[35]
which would be strongly opposed by the Torah
(cf. Galatians 6:13). If this is the case, then
to paraphrase, Paul was probably telling the
Galatians, “You who want to be subject to the
Torah’s penalties, do you not know what the
Torah prescribes for your punishment?” His
statement was used as a form of ironic rebuke.
Sadly, many theologians over the centuries have taken Paul’s letter
to the Galatians out of its ancient Jewish
context and have construed that this good
Pharisee taught against God’s Torah and taught
against the rite of circumcision. He did no such
things; but he did place these things in proper
perspective in regard to faith in the Messiah.
When Paul later tells these Galatians, “Behold
I, Paul, say to you that if you receive
circumcision, Messiah will be of no benefit to
you”
(Galatians 5:2), he is telling this group of
people that if they think circumcision and
proselyte conversion are the answers to their
problems—then do not even think about it! He is
not speaking to all people of all generations
that circumcision is wrong, but places it in
proper perspective, emphasizing that it is not a
salvation issue.[36]
Inclusion among the righteous occurs via faith
in God, beginning with the example of Abraham
(Romans 4:9-11).
Galatians 5:18
“But
if you are led by the Spirit, you are not
under the Law
[hupo nomon,
upo nomon].”
Knowing that “under the Law” can mean being subject to the Torah’s
penalties allows this verse to make much more
sense to us as Messianics. Those who are not led
by God’s Spirit break God’s Law (Romans 8:7).
But in contrast, those who are truly led by the
Holy Spirit will not be led to disobey the Lord,
which would cause them to stand under the
Torah’s penalties. This is because people who
are led by the Holy Spirit will naturally obey
the Lord and be blessed—just as the Torah tells
us, because the Spirit is to write God’s
commandments onto the redeemed person’s heart
(Ezekiel 36:26-27).
The Holy Spirit does, though, go beyond the Torah,
manifesting itself in the fruit of a Believer’s
changed life (Galatians 5:22-23), providing
discernment for life events where the Torah may
not deliver any instruction. This is what James
D.G. Dunn properly describes as “a
spontaneity and adaptability to the demands of
each specific situation which rules applied
whatever the circumstances can never match.”[37]
But the fruit of the Spirit is notably something
“against such there is no law” (Galatians 5:23,
RSV), as its virtues surely align with the
righteous tenor of God’s commandments.
1 Corinthians 9:20-21
“To
the Jews I became as a Jew, so that I might
win Jews; to those who are under the Law, as
under the Law
[tois hupo nomon hōs hupo nomon,
toiß upo nomon wß upo nomon]
though not being myself under the Law [hupo
nomon,
upo nomon],
so that I might win those who are under the
Law [hupo nomon kerdēsō,
upo nomon kerdhsw];
to those who are without law, as without
law, though not being without the law of God
but under the law of Christ [ennomos
Christou,
ennomoß Cristou],
so that I might win those who are without
law.”
1 Corinthians 9:20-21 is problematic for many people, because first
of all, it may seem as if Paul is wavering in
his obedience to the Torah. Secondly, most
Bibles have mistranslated v. 21 with “under the
law of Christ.”
Is Paul wavering in his Torah observance, being Torah observant
around Jews, and then not being Torah observant
around non-Jews? No, he is not. He says later on
in 1 Corinthians 11:1, “Be
imitators of me, just as I also am of Messiah.” If Paul is being truthful with us here, and Yeshua followed the
Torah, then Paul followed the Torah as an
imitator of the Messiah. Imitators of Paul are
to likewise do the same.
What Paul is saying in his remark “to the Jews I become as a Jew,”
is that he did his best to understand the
specialized needs of his audience. These were
the Jews who stood under the condemnation of the
Law, not being Believers in the Messiah redeemed
from sin, something that Paul as a Jewish
Believer was free from. Similarly, when Paul
said “to those who are without law, as without
law,” he did his best to relate to the pagans
who did not know God’s Torah. This is probably
best evident by Acts 17:22-23 when he was in
Athens debating with the Athenians, making note
of the Temple to the Unknown God which he viewed
as a memorial to the Holy One of Israel
(although the Atheninas did not know it). Paul
communicates that one must do his or her best to
relate to an audience, to best present them with
the good news of salvation in Yeshua.
So what about when Paul says that he is not “without
the law of God but [is] under the law of Christ”? (Keep in mind that if Yeshua is
indeed God, then the Torah of God is His Torah.)
Sadly, the rendering of “under the law of
Christ” in many Bibles is incorrect. It is a
mistranslation because earlier in v. 20 hupo
nomon is translated literally as “under the
Law,” but hupo nomon Christou (upo
nomon Cristou) or “under the Law of Christ” is not what appears in v. 21.
Rather, it is ennomos Christou (ennomoß
Cristou), which Young’s Literal Translation renders as “within law to
Christ,” and could also be understood as
“in-lawed to Christ.”[38]
This can certainly change one’s evaluation of Paul’s thoughts.
Ennomos (ennomoß)
means “what is within range of law and governed
or determined by law” (AMG).[39]
So by Paul saying that he is “within the Torah
to Messiah” (my rendering), he is following the
Torah as the Messiah demonstrated it (cf.
Galatians 6:2). Paul’s obedience is thus focused
around His work in his life and the imperatives
of the gospel as first seen in the Torah (cf.
Genesis 12:3; Galatians 3:8), beginning with
love for God and neighbor.[40]
The same should be true of us as well, as we are
to compose God’s Kingdom of priests (Exodus
19:6)—serving as intermediaries between Him and
the rest of the world.
Romans 2:12
“For
all who have sinned without the Law will
also perish without the Law, and all who
have sinned under the Law
[en nomō,
en nomw]
will be judged by the Law.”
Many believe that “under the Law” equates to Torah observance, but
this is neither an accurate assessment nor a
proper translation of these verses. Paul
describes the state of two different groups of
people relating to the judgment of God upon
sinners. He first mentions those who are
anomos (anomoß), “without
law, lawless”
(LS).[41]
This describes a behavioral pattern of those who
live without God’s Divine Law, and will thus die
in this manner. Whether one knows the specifics
of God’s Torah or not in this case is
irrelevant. The person turned over to sinful
behavior, knowing whether something is sin or
not, is still going to be judged by the
consequences of such sin. Paul states earlier in
Romans 1:24 that “God gave them over in the
lusts of their hearts to impurity.” By rejecting
Him, they accept sin, and are delivered up to it
and will be judged.
The second status is those who are en nomō
(en
nomw),
correctly rendered as “in law” (YLT). This is
referencing those who know the Torah of God, and
from it know what is considered acceptable and
unacceptable via its commandments. Paul writes
that those who sin while keeping this Law are
going to be judged by it. This judgment is going
to be much higher, because what is right and
wrong is clearly laid out by the Lord and His
commandments, whereas the person who just sins
lawlessly, not knowing what God considers
acceptable and unacceptable, may not be judged
as severely (cf. Revelation 20:12-13).
The next verse, Romans 2:13, says, “for
it is not the hearers of the Law who
are just before God, but the doers of the
Law will be justified.” The NIV actually says “it
is those who obey the law who will be declared
righteous.” The word translated “doers” is poiētēs
(poihthß,
sing.), “a
doer, performer,”
and “one who obeys or fulfils the law” (Thayer).[42]
It is used in James 1:22 where we are
admonished, “But prove yourselves doers [poiētēs]
of the word, and not merely hearers who delude
themselves.”
Its verb form, poieō (poiew),
appears when Yeshua tells us “whoever
keeps [poieō]
and teaches them, he shall be called
great in the kingdom of heaven” (Matthew 5:19b).
Obviously this does not at all speak against obeying the Torah,
because otherwise the doers of the Torah would
not somehow be considered just before God. Paul
speaks of the state of the person who lives
lawlessly or without the Torah, and then the
state of the person who lives according to its
standards. This does not at all mean that we can
be redeemed by our human works. But rather with
the correct understanding, “faith,
if it has no works, is dead, being by
itself”
(James 2:17), we see that works are natural
evidence of our salvation experience, and they
come naturally because of our love for the Lord.
They testify to outsiders that we are His
people. They also hold us accountable in that if
we know God’s Torah, we will be held to its high
standard—much more than those who do not know
it.
Romans 3:19
“Now
we know that whatever the Law says, it
speaks to those who are under the Law
[en tō nomō,
en tw nomw],
so that every mouth may be closed and all
the world may become accountable to God.”
The most literal rendering of Romans 3:19 is not with “under the
Law” but rather “in the Law,” en tō nomō
(en
tw nomw). What this means is that the Torah speaks directly to those who
know what it says. Paul also says that the
entire world is somehow “accountable” or
“guilty” (NKJV) before God because of the Torah,
likely because of basic principles of right and
wrong impressioned on the human psyche via His
image, which the Torah details in its
commandments. Hupodikos (upodikoß)
specifically means, “Under sentence, condemned,
liable, subject to prosecution” (AMG)[43]—a
status for pas ho kosmos (paß
o kosmoß) or the whole world.
Paul continues in the next verse, stating, “for through the Law
comes the knowledge of sin” (Romans 3:20b).
The Torah is to reveal the sin in one’s life,
and will hold all to accountability. The Torah
shows the world what it is guilty of and what it
will be punished for, as “the
mind set on the flesh is hostile toward God; for
it does not subject itself to the law of God,
for it is not even able to do so” (Romans
8:7).
Yet, the mind set on the Spirit (Romans 8:5) is
to subject itself to a spiritual Law from God
(Romans 7:14). God’s Torah shows born again
Believers the best way to get the most out of
their relationship with Him by obeying Him.
Romans 6:14-15
“For
sin shall not be master over you, for you
are not under law but under grace
[ou gar este hupo nomon, all’ hupo charin,
ou gar este upo nomon all upo carin].
What then? Shall we sin because we are not
under law but under grace [ouk esmen
hupo nomon, all’ hupo charin,
ouk esmen upo nomon all upo carin]?
May it never be!”
Are we allowed to sin and break God’s Torah because we are not
“under law,” but instead “under grace” as
redeemed saints? No. Prior to salvation, the
master of the unredeemed is sin, a status which
causes people to be “under law.” When Yeshua
becomes a person’s Master, he or she changes and
is “under grace.” Born again Believers are not
to find themselves “under law,” precisely
because they are covered by the blood of the
Messiah. We are no longer subject to the
condemnation pronounced by the Torah upon
sinners, because sin is no longer our lord.
Believers who are born again and redeemed are not subject to the
Torah’s punishments pronounced upon sinners—they
are not “under law.” Romans 6:14-15 demonstrates
our need to live responsibly being covered by
God’s grace, living in obedience to Him. If we
have been spiritually regenerated, we need to
take to serious heart what Yeshua had to endure
to take away the penalty of our disobedience
to the Law via His sacrifice! Being redeemed
from eternal punishment should be good
motivation for us to obey God.
Our faith in Yeshua does not nullify our need to obey God, just as
Paul has said, “Do
we then overthrow the law by this faith? By no
means! On the contrary, we uphold the law” (Romans 3:31, RSV). Torah obedience
comes as we emulate our Lord and Savior, and are
transformed by God’s love.
Are you “under the Law”?
Take notice of the words of Deuteronomy 27:26: “‘Cursed
is he who does not confirm the words of this law
by doing them.’ And all the people shall say,
‘Amen.’” The Hebrew verb translated “cursed” is arar (rra).
“[T]he
majority of ‘curse’ sayings with ‘ārar fall into
one of three general categories: (1) the
declaration of punishments…(2) the utterance of
[something]...(3) the proclamation of laws…It is
interesting that all these curse-sayings are
a reflex[ion] of one violating his
relationship to God” (TWOT).[44]
When we violate the commandments of God’s Torah
and fail to abide by its guidelines, we damage
the relationship with our Heavenly Father that
we should be having. Disobedience to the Lord
certainly does not help the communion that we
should be having with Him!
Yeshua the Messiah came to free us from slavery to sin and from the
curse of the Torah that hangs over sinners: “Messiah
redeemed us from the curse of the Law, having
become a curse for us—for it is written, ‘Cursed
is everyone who hangs on a tree’”
(Galatians 3:13; Deuteronomy 21:23). Paul tells
us in Colossians 2:13-14, “When
you were dead in your transgressions and the
uncircumcision of your flesh, He made you alive
together with Him, having forgiven us all our
transgressions, having canceled out the
certificate of debt consisting of decrees
against us, which was hostile to us; and He has
taken it out of the way, having nailed it to the
cross.”
Contrary to popular belief, this
certificate of debt
is not God’s Torah, but is rather the curse
pronounced in the Torah against sinners. Those
who have received Yeshua into their lives and
have been forgiven of their sin do not sit
under the penalty of the Law, with the Torah
ready to come crashing down on their heads. But
even so, this gives us no reason to disobey
God—for obedience brings blessings and
disobedience brings curses. When we disobey our
Father we damage the relationship that we have,
or should be having, with Him.
So what do you have to change in your life so you can find yourself
in obedience to the Lord—and hence not under any
kind of denunciation from the Law?
In our day and age, our Heavenly Father is doing new and exciting
things through the growth of the Messianic
movement, as more and more Believers are drawn
to their Hebraic Roots and a Torah obedient
lifestyle. The prophecies tell us that when
Israel is restored, “My
servant David will be king over them, and they
will all have one shepherd; and they will walk
in My ordinances and keep My statutes and
observe them” (Ezekiel 37:24). The heart of our Heavenly Father is that
we each demonstrate our love for Him and obey
Him: “Oh that they had such a heart in them,
that they would fear Me and keep all My
commandments always, that it may be well with
them and with their sons forever!” (Deuteronomy
5:29).
Do we want to be blessed or do we want to be penalized? Do we want
to have the best relationship with our Father as
is possible? Or do we want to have a strained
relationship? Consider these questions as you
ponder whether or not following the Torah is
important. Most importantly, make sure that you
are a redeemed, born again Believer, who does
not sit in fear under the Torah’s condemnation.[45]
J.K. McKee (B.A., University of Oklahoma; M.A. Student, Asbury
Theological Seminary) is the editor of TNN Online (www.tnnonline.net)
and is a Messianic apologist. He is author of several books,
including: The New Testament Validates Torah, Torah In the
Balance, Volume I, and When Will the Messiah Return?.
He has also written many articles on the Two Houses of Israel
and Biblical theology, and is presently focusing on Messianic
commentaries on various books of the Bible.
NOTES
[1]
This article has been reproduced from
the paperback edition of
Introduction to
Things Messianic,
pp 37-57.
[2]
These three areas are
discussed in order in Chapters 10, 11,
and 12.
[3]
BDB,
871.
[4]
Ibid., 878.
[5]
Ibid., 53.
[6]
Consult the author’s
article “The
Message of Deuteronomy”
for a further discussion.
[7]
Even though we surely
partake of the New Covenant as Believers
today (Hebrews 8:8-12), the New Covenant
also involves a future return and
restoration of the exiles of Israel to
the Promised Land, as indicated by the
wider cotext of Jeremiah 31.
[8]
Matthew 22:23; Acts 23:8.
[9]
It is said that the Oral
Torah was given to Moses (m.Avot
1:1), but this is certainly debatable.
Some oral teaching or instruction was
certainly given to Moses that over time
has been added to. The Mishnah (and
similarly the Talmud and Midrash)
contains valuable commentary on the
Torah and historical information that
should be consulted in theological
exegesis, but should not be considered
primary to the Biblical text itself.
For a further examination
on ancient Rabbinical literature,
consult Hermann L. Strack,
Introduction to the Talmud and Midrash
(New York and Philadelphia: Meridian
Books/Jewish Publication Society, 1959).
[10]
William L. Lane, Word
Biblical Commentary: Hebrews 1-8,
Vol. 47a (Nashville: Nelson Reference
and Electronic, 1991), cxxvi.
[11]
BDAG,
522.
[12]
Thayer,
pp 517-518.
[13]
Ibid., 115.
[14]
Zodhiates, Complete
Word Study Dictionary: New Testament,
561.
[15]
For a further discussion,
consult author’s exegetical paper on
Matthew 5:17-19, “Has
the Law Been Fulfilled?”
(forthcoming 2009).
[16]
It is at this point that
it does need to be clarified that
many Christians throughout history
have made an appeal to what is commonly
called the “moral law” of the Torah, and
they will certainly not be considered
“least.” (This is particularly true of
the Reformed/Calvinist and
Wesleyan/holiness traditions.)
One of my favorite
theologians, Old Testament scholar
Walter C. Kaiser, agrees that Yeshua did
not come to do away with the Torah. He
says, “Only those laws from which Christ
releases his church may be jettisoned” (Toward
Old Testament Ethics [Grand Rapids:
Zondervan, 1983], 312), meaning those
things directly impacted by the
Messiah’s sacrificial work. He and
today’s Messianics actually have no
disagreement on the validity of the
Torah; we just differ on the matter of
how much actually has changed
with Yeshua’s arrival.
[17]
Romans 2:12; 3:19;
6:14-15; 1 Corinthians 9:20-21;
Galatians 3:23; 4:4-5, 21; 5:18.
[18]
John A. Whitmer,
“Romans,” in John F. Walvoord and Roy B.
Zuck, eds., The Bible Knowledge
Commentary: New Testament (Wheaton,
IL: Victor Books, 1983), 464.
[19]
Ibid.
[20]
Exodus 20:13ff;
Deuteronomy 5:17ff; Leviticus 19:18.
[21]
David H. Stern, trans.,
Jewish New Testament
(Clarksville, MD: Jewish New Testament
Publications, 1995), xxiv.
Here, Stern follows the
conclusions of C.E.B. Cranfield,
International Critical Commentary:
Romans 9-16 (London: T&T Clark,
1979), 853.
[22]
David H. Stern, Jewish
New Testament Commentary
(Clarksville, MD: Jewish New Testament
Publications, 1995), 374.
[23]
Ariel and D’vorah
Berkowitz, Torah Rediscovered
(Lakewood, CO: First Fruits of Zion,
1996), 7.
[24]
Ibid., 113.
[25]
BDB,
435.
[26]
The NJPS version of the
Tanach consistently renders torah
as “Teaching,” and references to “Moses’
Teaching” are used throughout John
Goldingay’s Old Testament Theology:
Israel’s Gospel (Downers Grove, IL:
InterVarsity, 2003).
[27]
Romans 2:12; 3:19;
6:14-15; 1 Corinthians 9:20-21;
Galatians 3:23; 4:4-5, 21; 5:18.
[28]
Barclay M. Newman, Jr.,
A Concise Greek-English Dictionary of
the New Testament (Stuttgart: United
Bible Societies/Deutche
Bibelgesellschaft, 1971), 188.
[29]
Zodhiates, Complete
Word Study Dictionary: New Testament,
1015.
[30]
New Testament theologian
Douglas J. Moo does confirm how one
possible interpretation of “under the
Law” can be “under the condemnation
pronounced by the law,” even though he
considers it to be secondary at best
(“The Law of Christ as the Fulfillment
of the Law of Moses,” in Wayne G.
Strickland, ed., Five Views on Law
and Gospel [Grand Rapids: Zondervan,
1996], 361).
[31]
Grk. phroureō (frourew);
meaning “to maintain a watch, guard”
or “to provide security, guard,
protect, keep” (BDAG, pp
1066-1067).
[32]
Consult the FAQ on the
TNN website “Galatians
3:24-25” for a further
analysis.
[33]
John Wesley interpreted
this as, “Ye are not under the law—Not
under the curse or bondage of it; not
under the guilt or power of sin” (Explanatory
Notes Upon the New Testament,
reprint [Peterborough, UK: Epworth
Press, 2000], 697).
[34]
Note how these “works of
law” (Galatians 2:16[3x]; 3:2, 5, 10)
are likely identity markers that would
have defined an ancient Jewish religious
sect, and how it followed the Torah
(4QMMT).
For a further discussion,
consult James W. Thompson, “Works,” in
David Noel Freedman, ed., Eerdmans
Dictionary of the Bible (Grand
Rapids: Eerdmans, 2000), 1387; and the
author’s article “What Are ‘Works of the
Law’?”
[35]
Cf. remarks by Samuel J.
Mikolaski on Galatians 4:9, in D.
Guthrie and J.A. Motyer, eds., The
New Bible Commentary Revised (Grand
Rapids: Eerdmans, 1970), 1100.
[36]
The issue of circumcision
is thoroughly addressed in the author’s
article “Is Circumcision for Everyone?”
Also consult his commentary Galatians
for the Practical Messianic.
[37]
James D.G. Dunn,
Black’s New Testament Commentary: The
Epistle to the Galatians (Peabody,
MA: Hendrickson, 1993), 288.
[38]
Or the CJB rendering,
“within the framework of Torah as
upheld by the Messiah.”
[39]
Ibid., 591.
[40]
Deuteronomy 6:5;
Leviticus 19:18; cf. Matthew 22:36-40;
Mark 12:28-34; Luke 10:25-28.
[41]
LS,
74.
[42]
Thayer,
527.
[43]
Zodhiates, Complete
Word Study Dictionary: New Testament,
1422.
[44]
Victor P. Hamilton, “rra,”
in TWOT, 1:75.
[45]
A more
detailed exegetical analysis of this
subject matter will be available in the
forthcoming paperback edition of the
author’s book The New Testament
Validates Torah, where Romans 3:9;
7:6, 14; Philippians 3:6; Hebrews 7:11;
9:15, 22 (all RSV) will be also be
addressed.
|