|

POSTED 01 AUGUST, 2003
What Does "Under the Law" Really Mean?
by
J.K. McKee
editor@tnnonline.net
Those of you who have been in the
Messianic community for any elongated period of
time know that we can be a controversial group
of people. Those of us who were raised in
mainstream Christianity and have left the Church
have questioned much of what we were taught in
the past, testing it against Scripture. While
Christianity gave many of us a foundational
grounding in the Word of God, and indeed
presented us the truth of the good news of
salvation available in Yeshua the Messiah (Jesus
Christ), it is a human religious system, and as
such did present us with some non-Biblical
teachings.
One of the errant teachings of much of
Christianity, which has re-arisen in the past
few years as the Messianic movement has gotten
larger, is the belief that Yeshua the Messiah
came to abolish the Torah or the Law of Moses.
Those of us who have come into the conservative
Messianic community of faith[1]
do not believe this to be true. We evidence this
in our lifestyle by practicing many things that
Christianity has deemed unimportant for the Body
of Messiah, but likewise were adhered to by
Yeshua’s early followers. We keep the
seventh-day Sabbath or Shabbat, we
celebrate the Biblical holidays of Leviticus 23,
and we follow the kosher dietary laws. These are
just a few Torah practices that most believe are
unimportant.
Now this I do not choose, as some
in the Messianic community do: to vehemently
criticize, berate, and harass Christians who do
not feel the same way as I do about these
issues. I have taken my fair share of negative
comments and realize that some are not ready to
receive the message. All things happen in the
Lord’s timing. But, one of the reasons why there
can be problems between Christians and
Messianics is because many Messianics do not
know how to properly defend their faith and
practice. Rather than examining Scripture,
insulting terms are usually thrown around and
fights ensue.[2]
This is most evident when Christians who oppose
Torah obedience claim that we are “under the
Law”—and that this is not a position that
Believers who have received the Messiah should
want to find themselves. Sadly, in our opinion,
much of the Messianic handling of this one
phrase has been anything but proper. We must be
able to properly respond to this.
This article addresses the phrase
“under the Law,” how it is used in Scripture,
and what it really means in its appropriate
context in light of what both the Tanach and
Apostolic Scriptures tell us. We will examine
Yeshua’s words on the matter of the Torah. We
will examine how a variety of Christians and
Messianic theologians have handled this term. We
will then test these claims against Scripture.
When you finish reading, it is our sincere
prayer that the next time a Christian says that
you as a Messianic are “under the Law,” you will
be able to properly respond to his claim.
Blessings and Curses
Before we examine the phrase
“under the Law,” it is imperative that we
understand the importance that the Torah plays
in the life of a born again Believer who is
maturing in his or her faith. Why was Ancient
Israel given the Torah?
Our Heavenly Father says in
Deuteronomy 7:6, “For you are a holy people to
the Lord
your God; the
Lord
your God has chosen you to be a people for His
own possession out of all the peoples who are on
the face of the earth.” The Hebrew word
qodesh (vdq)
specifically means, “apartness,
sacredness, holiness”
(BDB).[3]
What this means is that Israel is supposed to be
separate from all the other peoples of the
world. This was to come about by Israel keeping
God’s commandments that were contained in His
Instruction, the Torah:
“The
Lord
will establish you as a holy people to Himself,
as He swore to you, if you keep the commandments
of the
Lord your God and walk in His ways. So
all the peoples of the earth will see that you
are called by the name of the
Lord,
and they will be afraid of you. The
Lord
will make you abound in prosperity, in the
offspring of your body and in the offspring of
your beast and in the produce of your ground, in
the land which the
Lord
swore to your fathers to give you” (Deuteronomy
28:9-11).
If Israel is faithful to honor
and keep the Torah, then Israel is promised by
God to be “establish[ed]…as a holy people,” and
it will lead to Israel’s greatness. The Hebrew
verb qum (~Wq)
appears in the Hifil stem (casual action, active
voice) and has a variety of possible
applications in this text, including: “cause
to arise, raise,”
“fig. raise (to dignity, power),” and “erect,
build” (BDB).[4]
This is an indication that if
Israel keeps the commandments that they will
become a great people and be blessed by the
Lord. Deuteronomy 4:5-6 specifically says,
“See, I have taught you statutes
and judgments just as the
Lord my God commanded me, that you should do thus in the land
where you are entering to possess it. So keep
and do them, for that is your wisdom and
your understanding in the sight of the peoples
who will hear all these statutes and say,
‘Surely this great nation is a wise and
understanding people.’”
Notice that by Israel’s obeying
the Torah, it would be said of them that “Surely
this great nation is a wise and understanding
people.” If there is anything that we need
today, it is wise people who know Yeshua and can
understand things with the power of the Holy
Spirit. They need to be able to discern things
based first and foremost on Scripture.
But what if the people do not
heed the words of the Torah and disobey? Before
Moses’ death at the end of Deuteronomy, the
assembly of Israel is taken to Mounts Ebal and
Gerizim. They are divided up and twelve distinct
blessings and curses are pronounced upon the
tribes (Deuteronomy 27:1-26). They end with a
final word: “‘Cursed is he who does not confirm
the words of this law by doing them.’ And all
the people shall say, ‘Amen’” (Deuteronomy
27:26).
This is not a light usage of Amein (!ma),
or “verily, truly” (BDB).[5]
To paraphrase, the people of Israel are told
that if they do not allow the Torah to be upheld
and be established as their ruling principles,
that they will be cursed because of their sin.
In their being cursed, they would find
themselves subject to the Torah’s penalties and
would thus no longer be “under mercy” or “under
grace.” Their answer to God’s request is
so be it. These are not light words by
any means.
Scriptural history and the nature
of man reveal that Ancient Israel was not
faithful in keeping the Torah. In fact, both the
Lord and Moses knew this would happen.
Deuteronomy chs. 29 and 30 discuss the judgment
and curses that have been placed on all of
Israel because of disobedience. However, though
Israel has been disobedient to the Torah, there
are still blessings to be gained by following
it. This is what our Father has wanted all
along. He gave His people the Torah and its
commandments to be a blessing to us to
demonstrate His love for us. Because of our love
toward our Heavenly Father, we should then
naturally follow what He has told us to do:
“Now, Israel, what does the
Lord
your God require from you, but to fear the
Lord
your God, to walk in all His ways and love Him,
and to serve the
Lord
your God with all your heart and with all your
soul, and to keep the
Lord’s
commandments and His statutes which I am
commanding you today for your good?”
(Deuteronomy 10:12-13).
The Lord says that His
commandments are l’tov lakha (%l
bAjl),
“for your benefit” (ATS). The Torah was not
given as something to place people in legalistic
bondage or be a yoke to them, but rather to
provide those who are a part of His people the
best way to succeed on Planet Earth, both
spiritually and physically.
Of course, over the centuries
since Moses was given the task of delivering the
Torah until Yeshua, there was disobedience to
it. After the people of Israel entered into the
Promised Land, there were struggles with how to
implement the Torah as “the Law of the Land.”
Israel was at its pinnacle as a Kingdom during
the reigns of Kings David and Solomon, but
because of Solomon’s idolatry and
disobedience to the Torah, the Kingdom
split. The Northern Kingdom of Israel/Ephraim
was taken captive by Assyria because of its
disobedience, and has been corporately spread
into the nations/Gentiles until this day. The
Southern Kingdom of Judah was taken into
Babylonian exile shortly thereafter, but
returned to the Land of Israel when Babylon was
conquered by Persia. The Jewish people, being
the sole torchbearers of Israel for almost 2,500
years, have taken the Torah very seriously
because of this judgment. As all Israel is to be
restored in the Last Days according to Biblical
prophecy, we see non-Jewish Believers in Yeshua
beginning to take the Torah very seriously.
This, as you can imagine, is causing quite a
stir.
What did Yeshua say?
By the time Yeshua walked the Earth, there were
various parties in the Jewish community that
approached the Torah differently. The two
parties most featured in the Apostolic
Scriptures are the Pharisees and Sadducees. The
Sadducees only accepted the Written Torah,
Genesis-Deuteronomy, as being relevant
Scripture, and did not regard what is considered
the rest of the Tanach (Old Testament), or the
Prophets and Writings, as applicable. As a
result, they had a very limited view of the
world and did not believe in the resurrection of
the dead,[6]
angels, demons, or miracles. The Pharisees, in
contrast, considered the entire Tanach as
applicable Scripture, and they believed in the
resurrection, angels, demons, and miracles. But
they also believed in the validity of the Oral
Torah or Oral Law, which composed various oral
traditions carried down over the centuries which
gave explanations to the commandments. This Oral
Law was later written in the 200s C.E. and is
what we now largely know as the Mishnah.[7]
The Pharisees and the Sadducees made up the
religious council known as the Sanhedrin.
Many people who read the
Apostolic Scriptures or New Testament believe
that the Pharisees are all antagonists against
Yeshua. Of course, many of them were, but so
were many Sadducees. Yet at the same time, many
other of His followers were Pharisees—and
indeed, Yeshua’s theology and that of His
Disciples was closer to that of the Pharisees
than that of the Sadducees. In fact, the Apostle
Paul did indeed proclaim before the Sanhedrin,
egō Pharisaios eimi
(egw
Farisaioß eimi)
or ani P’rush (vWrP
yna,
UBSHNT), “I am a Pharisee” (Acts 23:6).
Surprisingly to some Paul does not say,
“I was a Pharisee.”
If you have an understanding of
the First Century times in which Yeshua lived,
and have committed yourself to Torah study, you
will have an appropriate background of the
Gospel narratives and will discover that when
Yeshua debates with the Pharisees, it is most
often over Torah interpretation and application,
not “doing away” with commandments as is often
viewed.
So what were Yeshua’s words on
the Torah? Consider what He says in Matthew
5:17-19 in His Sermon on the Mount:
“Do not think that I came to
abolish the Law or the Prophets; I did not come
to abolish but to fulfill. For truly I say to
you, until heaven and earth pass away, not the
smallest letter or stroke shall pass from the
Law until all is accomplished. Whoever then
annuls one of the least of these commandments,
and teaches others to do the same, shall
be called least in the kingdom of heaven; but
whoever keeps and teaches them, he shall
be called great in the kingdom of heaven.”
These three verses of Scripture
are of primary importance for us who believe
that Yeshua is the Messiah and that He is the
Word of God made flesh—meaning that by living a
perfect life He followed the Torah perfectly and
is without sin. Because Yeshua is our example
for living, all Scripture regarding the Torah
must be interpreted through these words. No
matter how hard it may seem to be, or how
unpopular it may be, those claims that the Torah
has been done away with and that it is no longer
relevant for today must be reconciled to
these words, that is if Yeshua is indeed God
and His words are final.
What is Yeshua saying?
When the Messiah says, “Do not think that I came
to abolish the Law or the Prophets,” He is
telling us that His mission is not to do
away with the Law of Moses, contrary to what
some theologians may have said in the past. The
Greek verb translated here as “abolish” is
kataluō (kataluw),
meaning, “to end the effect or validity of
someth., put an end to” (BDAG).[8]
He
says quite clearly “Think not that I am come to
destroy the law, or the prophets” (KJV).
Yeshua tells us what His mission
is regarding the Torah: “I did not come to
abolish, but to fulfill.” The Greek verb
plēroō (plhrow)
means “to
make full, to fill, to fill up,”
“to carry into effect, bring to realization,
realize” (Thayer).[9]
What this means is that in “fulfilling” the
Torah, Yeshua came to live it properly as our
example. Many do not believe this to be true,
and instead believe that the Messiah “fulfilled”
the Torah only in a prophetic sense, and that it
is not relevant to be followed today. But
fulfill is by no means a synonym for abolish!
Yeshua’s next words indicate the correct context
of the passage and what He is actually telling
us:
“For truly I say to you, until
heaven and earth pass away, not the smallest
letter or stroke shall pass from the Law until
all is accomplished.”
This verse is confusing for some, because the
KJV says “till all be fulfilled.” However, the
verb translated as “fulfilled” in the KJV of v.
18 is not plēroō, but is rather
gignomai (gignomai),
“to become” (Thayer).[10]
“Fulfilled” is a misleading translation, and the
Messiah says until all is accomplished
that the smallest letter and stroke, or “jot and
tittle” (KJV) of the Torah, will not pass away.
These are references to the minutest serifs and
letters of the Hebrew alef-bet. He makes
a reference to Heaven and Earth passing away
before the Torah passes away. Are Heaven and
Earth still here? Yes. So why do we have those
who say that the Torah is no longer for today?
Have they somehow
missed it?
We know that the validity and
relevance of the Torah continues to this day as
Yeshua concludes His remarks with the following:
“Whoever then annuls one of the
least of these commandments, and teaches others
to do the same, shall be called least in
the kingdom of heaven; but whoever keeps and
teaches them, he shall be called great in
the kingdom of heaven” (Matthew 5:18-19).
The Messiah attaches rewards to those who keep
the commandments of the Torah and teach them to
others, and penalties to those who do not keep
the commandments and teach others to break them.
The word “least” or elachistos (elacistoß)
is of extreme importance. AMG defines
this as, “The least, minimal in magnitude,” “in
number and quantity,” “in rank or dignity,” “in
weight or importance.”[11]
What does this mean? Does it mean that many who
have taught that the Torah is no longer to be
followed are going to be given few rewards in
the Kingdom?
It is not our place as humans to
judge the
(eternal) status of anyone,
but we must heed the Lord’s words and endeavor
to follow His admonition.
The Torah was originally given to
Israel to be a blessing. Those who followed the
Torah and obeyed its commandments would reap the
rewards of obedience. Those who disregarded the
Torah and disobeyed its commandments would be
cursed. In today’s vernacular, we might say that
the Torah can either be your “best friend” or
your “worst enemy.” As Believers, we are indeed
forgiven of our sin when we fall—but we are to
strive not to sin. The Apostle John
writes, “The one who keeps His commandments
abides in Him, and He in him. We know by this
that He abides in us, by the Spirit whom He has
given us” (1 John 3:24).
So how does not being “under the
Law” factor into this?
What Christians Have Said About
“Under the Law”
Before we explain the phrase
“under the Law” from a Messianic perspective, it
is important that we understand what the
traditional Christian handling of “under the
Law” means, so we can know what to respond to.
In the New American Standard Bible, 1995 Updated
Edition (NASU), which is a widely used and
respected literal Christian translation, the
terms “under the Law” or “under Law” appear in
eleven verses.[12]
Further on we discuss how some verses cannot be
literally translated with “under Law.” The
example that we have chosen to see the standard
Christian interpretation is Romans 6:14-15:
“For sin shall not be master over
you, for you are not under law but under grace.
What then? Shall we sin because we are not under
law but under grace? May it never be!” (NASU).
The Bible Knowledge Commentary,
New Testament,
edited by Dallas Theological Seminary
theologians John F. Walvoord and Roy B. Zuck,
states the following concerning these verses:
“The mention that believers are ‘under grace’
(v. 14) raised another aberrant idea that the
apostle refuted. The question is, Shall we
sin because we are… under grace instead of
the Law?… Paul’s response was the same as
before (v. 2): By no means!”[13]
This commentary equates being “under the Law” as
observing the Torah, by using the description
“under grace instead of Law.” It says
that when Paul says that Believers are “under
grace” they are no longer obligated to observe
the Torah, but at the same time that Believers
are not permitted to sin. But what defines sin?
The commentary goes on to say, “this can be done
by following Paul’s instructions.”[14]
But what does Paul himself say in
Romans 3:20? “[F]or through the Law comes
the knowledge of sin.” The Apostle John further
says, “Everyone who practices sin also practices
lawlessness; and sin is lawlessness” (1 John
3:4), so sin is violation of the Torah. In 2
Corinthians 6:14 Paul admonishes, “Do not be
bound together with unbelievers; for what
partnership have righteousness and lawlessness,
or what fellowship has light with darkness?” How
can these unbelievers be practitioners of
lawlessness if they are not breaking, whether
knowingly or unknowingly, the Torah of God?
This Christian interpretation of
“under the Law” comes up short because both Paul
and John testify that sin is defined by the
Torah, and to avoid lawlessness. As the Torah
demonstrates, if you disobey the commandments
then you will be cursed. If we are instructed by
Paul not to sin, and the Scriptural definition
of sin is defined as lawlessness or disobedience
to the Torah, then Paul is actually telling us
not to transgress the Law of Moses contrary to
what many in Christianity may believe.
Christian theologians need to
examine the whole of Scripture, especially when
telling us that Believers are to exclusively
follow Paul’s instructions. When Paul says, “For
this, ‘You
shall not commit adultery, you shall not murder,
you shall not steal, you shall not covet,’
and if there is any other commandment, it is
summed up in this saying, ‘You
shall love your neighbor as yourself’”
(Romans 13:9), he was not just “making this
stuff up.” He was quoting directly from the
Torah. And if Paul still upholds the
commandments of the Torah as being valid and
relevant instruction for the Believer, then what
does “under the Law” really mean?
The standard Christian
interpretation of “under the Law” as being
obedient to the Torah also comes up short
because of the position of unbelievers in this
paradigm. Are unbelievers who have rejected
salvation in the Messiah “under Law” or “under
grace”? Considering that Paul’s letters were
written to regions of the Roman Empire where the
non-Jewish, non-believing populace was not
following the Law of Moses, this is something
that needs to be seriously considered. Is not
being “under grace” something that is only
available for those who know the Messiah and
have been redeemed? Keep in mind that when you
disobey the Torah you are cursed. Would not the
non-believing pagans in the communities to which
Paul was writing be cursed by their sin: their
idolatry, fornication, homosexuality, etc.?
If these pagans are not “under
grace,” then what are they? They cannot be
“under nothing.” Paul says in Romans 1:25,
concerning the heathen, that “they exchanged the
truth of God for a lie, and worshiped and served
the creature rather than the Creator.” Romans 1
in its entirety discusses how these people are
turned over to sin. What is the status of these
people? We often do not see a satisfactory
answer by Christian theologians.
What Messianics Have Said About
“Under the Law”
What has the Messianic handling
of the term “under the Law” been? Those
Messianics who believe that Torah obedience is
something that should be encouraged in the Body
of Messiah have had a substantial amount of
Christian teaching relating to the Law of Moses,
that is engrained in the minds of many, to
address. As a result, there are varied responses
to what “under the Law” really means.
Most of the Messianics that I have encountered
turn to the works of Messianic Jewish theologian
David H. Stern, author of several books,
including the Jewish New Testament and
Jewish New Testament Commentary. He explains
his opinion that the Greek phrase “upo nomon,”
which is translated as “under Law” in most
Bibles, more accurately means “in subjection to
the system which results in perverting the
Torah into legalism.”[15]
Using the example of Romans 6:14-15 given above,
he translates these verses,
“For sin will not have authority
over you; because you are not under legalism but
under grace. Therefore, what conclusion should
we reach? ‘Let’s go on sinning, because we’re
not under legalism but under grace’? Heaven
forbid!”
Justifying this translation, Stern remarks in
his Jewish New Testament Commentary that
“The word twice translated ‘under,’ upo,
means ‘controlled by’…or ‘in
subjection to,’”[16]
which leads him to conclude that the best
translation of nomos (nomoß)
is “legalism,” rather than the traditional
translation “Law,” which would mean “Torah.”
While there is without doubt an understanding
that perverting the Torah of God into legalism
is wrong, critics of the Messianic movement have
attacked Stern for subjectively rendering
nomos as “legalism” in some places, and then
as “Torah” in others. While Stern’s works
have certainly helped the Messianic community,
it is notable that his translation is not
literal, and thus cannot be used as a prime
source work in refuting any antinomianism that
one may encounter.
I also believe that many Messianics have
misdiagnosed the problem of why Christians are
hesitant to adopt a Torah observant lifestyle.
Messianic Jewish authors Ariel and D’vorah
Berkowitz comment in their work Torah
Rediscovered, “First and foremost, the Torah
is ‘God’s teaching.’…The word does not mean
‘law’; it means ‘teaching.’”[17]
They further state that Bible translators could
not just “break out of their centuries-old
tradition” and “have chosen a translation of
‘law’ where Torah would have been the
accurate translation.”[18]
The root problem of why Christians are hesitant
to following the Torah is said by many
Messianics to be that both torah (hrAT)
in the Hebrew Scriptures and nomos (nomoß)
in the Greek Scriptures should be translated as
Torah and not law. We should not
doubt by any means that the Hebrew word torah—derived
from the Hebrew verb yarah (hry),
meaning to “throw,
cast,”
“shoot (arrows),” and “direct, teach,
instruct” (BDB)[19]—more
accurately means “Teaching”[20]
or “Instruction,” or just plain “Torah.” There
have been some serious misunderstandings
regarding its translation as “Law.” But, I
cannot concur that this is the primary problem.
It is only a modern phenomenon
whereby the word “law” has come to have a
negative connotation among Christians, as law
and order are good things. The Jewish Rabbis who
translated the Hebrew Bible into Greek three
centuries before the Messiah thought the same
thing, and thought that nomos, the Greek
word for “law,” was the best rendering for
torah. This carried into the Apostolic
Scriptures. Perhaps if they had known that in
the future “law” would come to have a negative
meaning they would have chosen something else,
but we have to live with their decision.
To diagnose the translation of
torah as nomos or law as being
the primary problem is not proper, especially
when the term “law” is used frequently in many
Jewish Torah commentaries, and even the 1917
Jewish Press Society version to translate
torah. It would not even occur to most
Christian translators to render torah or
nomos as “Torah” in English versions of
the New Testament.
The primary problem of why many
Christians do not want to adopt a Torah obedient
lifestyle is something that many people are not
willing to see, including many in the Messianic
community. This reason is humanity’s inherent
disobedience or rebellion toward God,
which results in sin and being accursed just as
the Torah tells us. Consider that Paul wrote in
2 Thessalonians 2:7, “the mystery of lawlessness
is already at work.” This epistle of his was
written in about 50-52 C.E., some twenty years
after the ascension of Yeshua into Heaven. By
the end of the First Century, lawlessness or
disobedience to the Torah grew to such an extent
in the ekklēsia, that we can understand
the Apostle John’s poignant words where he says,
“By this we know that we have come to know Him,
if we keep His commandments. The one who says,
‘I have come to know Him,’ and does not keep His
commandments, is a liar, and the truth is not in
him” (1 John 2:3-4). John directly tells His
audience that if they do not follow the Torah,
but at the same time claim to know the Messiah,
then they were speaking lies.
We are now in an appropriate
position to understand what “under the Law”
really means.
What Scripture Says About “Under
the Law”
The phrase “under Law” or “under
the Law” is used in eleven verses in the NASU,
which is a widely used translation by many
Christians, and is widely respected in the
Messianic community as well. We will use this
translation as our base of comparison for
properly understanding what this phrase means.
In the Greek, the phrase “under
Law” is hupo nomon (upo
nomon).
Hupo (upo),
when appearing with an accusative case noun
(indicating direct object), can mean
“under, below; under the authority of” (CGEDNT).[21]
Nomos
is defined by AMG as “spoken in the NT
mostly of the Mosaic statutes,”[22]
meaning the Torah, but it is notable that it can
also mean, “law as decreed by a state and set up
as the standard for the administration of
justice” (Vine).[23]
We point this out because nomos can also
refer to Greek or Roman law, or extra-Biblical
Jewish law.[24]
James H. Nichols, Jr., in his translation of
Plato’s Gorgias, indicates, “Nomos,
translated ‘law’ or ‘convention,’ includes
written law, unwritten law, custom, and
prevalent opinion.”[25]
Keep this in mind when you see the word “law” in
Scripture.
Let us now examine each of the
eleven references where “under Law” is used,
placing them in their proper context.
Romans 2:12
“For all who have sinned without
the Law will also perish without the Law, and
all who have sinned under the Law will be judged
by the Law.”
Most Christian theologians
believe that “under the Law” equates to Torah
observance, but this is neither an accurate
assessment nor a proper translation of these
verses. Paul describes the state of two
different groups of people relating to the
judgment of God upon sinners. He first mentions
those who are anomos (anomoß),
“without
law, lawless”
(LS).[26]
This describes a behavioral pattern of those who
live without God’s Divine Law, and will thus die
in this manner. Whether one knows God’s Torah or
not in this case is irrelevant. The person
turned over to sinful behavior, knowing it is
sin or not, is going to be judged by the
consequences of that sin. Paul states earlier in
Romans 1:24 that “God gave them over in the
lusts of their hearts to impurity.” By rejecting
Him, they accept sin, and are delivered up to it
and will be judged in their lawless behavior.
The second status is those who
are en nomō (en
nomw),
correctly rendered as “in law” (YLT). This is
referencing those who know the Torah of God, and
what is considered acceptable and unacceptable
via its commandments. Paul writes that those who
sin while keeping this Law are going to be
judged by it. This judgment is going to be much
higher because what is right and wrong is
clearly laid out by the Lord and His
commandments, whereas the person who just sins
lawlessly, not knowing what God considers
acceptable and unacceptable, may not be judged
as severely.
The next verse, Romans 2:13,
says, “for it is not the hearers of the
Law who are just before God, but the
doers of the Law will be justified.” The NIV
actually says “it is those who obey the law who
will be declared righteous.” The word translated
“doers” is poiētēs (poihthß,
sing.), “a
doer, performer,”
and “one who obeys or fulfils the law” (Thayer).[27]
It is used in James 1:22 where we are
admonished, “But prove yourselves doers [poiētēs]
of the word, and not merely hearers who delude
themselves.” Its verb form, poieō (poiew),
appears when Yeshua tells us “whoever keeps [poieō]
and teaches them, he shall be called
great in the kingdom of heaven” (Matthew 5:19b).
Obviously this does not at all
speak against obeying the Torah, because
otherwise the doers of the Torah would not
somehow be considered just before God. Paul
speaks of the state of the person who lives
lawlessly or without the Torah, and then the
state of the person who lives according to its
standards. This does not mean that we are “saved
by works,” but rather with the correct
understanding, “faith, if it has no works, is
dead, being by itself” (James 2:17).
Works are natural evidence of our salvation
experience, and come naturally because of our
love for the Lord. They testify to outsiders
that we are His people.
Romans 3:19
“Now we know that whatever the
Law says, it speaks to those who are under the
Law, so that every mouth may be closed and all
the world may become accountable to God.”
The most literal rendering of Romans 3:19 is not
with “under the Law” but rather “in the Law,”
en tō nomō (en
tw nomw).
What this means is that the Torah speaks
directly to those who know what it says. Yet,
Paul also says that the entire world is somehow
“accountable” or “guilty” (NKJV) to God because
of the Torah, likely because of basic principles
of right and wrong impressioned on the human
psyche that the Torah speaks about. Hupodikos
(upodikoß)
specifically means, “Under sentence, condemned,
liable, subject to prosecution” (AMG).[28]
The next verse, Romans 3:20,
clarifies by telling us “because by the works of
the Law no flesh will be justified in His sight;
for through the Law comes the knowledge
of sin.” In other words, the Torah reveals the
sin in our lives and will hold all of us to
accountability. The Torah shows the world what
it is guilty of and what it will be punished
for. But the Torah also shows Believers in the
Messiah the best way to get the most out of our
relationship with our Heavenly Father by obeying
Him.
Romans 6:14-15
“For sin shall not be master over
you, for you are not under law but under grace.
What then? Shall we sin because we are not under
law but under grace? May it never be!”
Are we allowed to sin and break
the Torah because we are not “under law” as
redeemed saints? No. Since the Biblical
definition of sin is violation of the Torah,
being “under law” or “under Torah” cannot
possibly mean being obedient to the Torah. As
born again Believers we do not find ourselves
“under Torah,” but rather “under grace”—covered
by the blood of the Messiah because we are
not subject to the punishment of Torah
violation. Being “under
law” in this construct must mean being subject
to the Torah’s punishments.
Believers who are born again and
redeemed are not subject to the Torah’s
punishments pronounced upon sinners and are not
“under Law.” Romans 6:14-15 demonstrates our
need to live responsibly being covered by God’s
grace, living in obedience to Him. If we have
been spiritually regenerated, we need to
remember that Yeshua has taken away the penalty
of our disobedience to the Law. But as Paul has
previously said, our faith in Yeshua does not
nullify our need to obey God:
“Do we then overthrow the law by
this faith? By no means! On the contrary, we
uphold the law” (Romans 3:31, RSV).
1 Corinthians 9:20-21
“To the Jews I became as a Jew,
so that I might win Jews; to those who are under
the Law, as under the Law though not being
myself under the Law, so that I might win those
who are under the Law; to those who are without
law, as without law, though not being without
the law of God but under the law of Christ, so
that I might win those who are without law.”
1 Corinthians 9:20-21 is
problematic for many people, because first of
all, it may seem as if Paul is wavering in his
obedience to the Torah. Secondly, most Bibles
have mistranslated v. 21 with “under the law of
Christ.”
Is Paul wavering in his Torah
observance, being Torah observant around Jews
and then not being Torah observant around those
of the nations? No, he is not. He says later on
in 1 Corinthians 11:1, “Be imitators of me, just
as I also am of Messiah.” If Paul is being
truthful with us here, and Yeshua followed the
Torah, then Paul followed the Torah as an
imitator of the Messiah. Imitators of Paul are
to likewise do the same.
What Paul is saying by “to the
Jews I become as a Jew,” is that he does his
best to understand his audience. These are the
Jews who are “under the Law” or subject to its
penalties, not being Believers in the Messiah
redeemed from sin, something that Paul as a
Jewish Believer was free from. Similarly, when
Paul says “to those who are without law, as
without law,” he does his best to relate to the
pagans who do not know the Torah. This is
probably best evident by Acts 17:22-23 when he
was in Athens debating with the Athenians, and
made note of the Temple to the Unknown God,
which he said was a memorial to the Holy One of
Israel (although the Atheninas did not know it).
Paul is telling us to do our best to relate to
our audience that we might best present them
with the good news of salvation in Yeshua.
So what about when he says that
he is “not being without the law of God but
under the law of Christ”? Keep in mind that if
Yeshua is indeed God, then the Torah of God is
His Torah. Sadly, the translation of “under the
law of Christ” in many Bibles is incorrect. It
is a mistranslation because earlier in v. 20
hupo nomon is translated literally as “under
the Law” meaning “under Torah.” But hupo
nomon Christou (upo
nomon Cristou),
“under the Law of Christ,” is not what appears
in the Greek text of v. 21. Rather, it is
ennomos Christou (ennomoß
Cristou),
which Young’s Literal Translation renders as
“within law to Christ.”
This certainly changes our perspective.
Ennomos (ennomoß)
means “what is within range of law and governed
or determined by law” (AMG).[29]
In other words, by Paul saying that he is
“within the Torah to Messiah,” he is following
the Torah as the Messiah demonstrated it and his
obedience is thus focused around His work in his
life and the imperatives of the gospel as first
seen in the Torah (cf. Genesis 12:3; Galatians
3:8).
Galatians 3:23
“But before faith came, we were
kept in custody under the law, being shut up to
the faith which was later to be revealed.”
Galatians 3:23, although usually interpreted as
meaning that being “in custody” or “confined”
(RSV) or “held prisoners” (NIV) “under the law”
pertains to being Torah obedient, takes on an
entirely new perspective when we understand that
being “under the Law” means being subject to
the Torah’s penalties upon sinners.
Galatians 3:23 speaks of the fact that before
our faith in Messiah Yeshua came, we were
“imprisoned and guarded” (NRSV).[30]
This position of the Torah changes when
we receive Messiah Yeshua into our lives and
receive forgiveness from our sins. We are
released from the bondage to sin and are no
longer “under the law.” But this does not mean
that the Torah no longer has relevance for us as
Believers and that we are to cast aside its
ethics and morality. It no longer serves the
same purpose as it did prior to our salvation
experience.
Galatians 4:4-5
“But when the fullness of the
time came, God sent forth His Son, born of a
woman, born under the Law, so that He might
redeem those who were under the Law, that we
might receive the adoption as sons.”
These verses are fairly
straightforward when we understand that “under
the Law” or “under Torah” means being subject to
the Torah’s penalties. Our Heavenly Father sent
His Son Yeshua during the time when all humanity
was still “under the Law,” because He had not
yet been sacrificed at Golgotha (Calvary) for
our sin as the final atonement. Yeshua the
Messiah came to “redeem those who were under the
Law,” those who stood condemned because of
violating the Torah. Via the power of Yeshua and
His atoning work, the curse of the Law has been
remitted!
Galatians 4:21
“Tell me, you who want to be
under law, do you not listen to the law?”
Galatians 4:21 has been a cause
of some misunderstanding, again because the
proper definition of “under the Law” as being
subject to the Torah’s punishments upon sinners
has not been applied. When we understand the
situation that Paul faced in Galatia, his words
can be properly understood. There was a sect of
Judaizers in Galatia that said if you do not
follow “the works of the Law” as they did,
being circumcised and converting to Judaism,
that you could not be saved. This was
influencing many people and was leading people
into bondage to sin because legalistic Torah
observance will lead to stumbling, as opposed to
Spirit-led obedience that comes as natural
evidence of a true born again experience. Some
expositors believe that the Judaizers were using
the platform of Torah observance to promote
errant teachings in the assembly related to
Jewish mysticism, which would be strongly
opposed by the Torah. If this is the case, then
to paraphrase, Paul was probably telling the
Galatians, “You who want to be subject to the
Torah’s penalties, do you not know what the
Torah prescribes for your punishment?” It was a
form of ironic rebuke.
Sadly, many theologians over the
centuries have taken Paul’s letter to the
Galatians out of its Jewish context and have
construed that this rabbi and Pharisee taught
against the Torah and taught against the rite of
circumcision. He did no such things; but he did
place these things in proper perspective in
regard to faith in the Messiah. When Paul later
tells these Galatians, “Behold I, Paul, say to
you that if you receive circumcision, Messiah
will be of no benefit to you”
(Galatians 5:2), he is telling this group of
people that if they think circumcision and
conversion are going to save them, then do not
even think about it. He is not speaking to all
people of all generations that circumcision is
wrong, but he is again placing it in proper
perspective and emphasizing that it is not a
salvation issue.[31]
Galatians 5:18
“But if you are led by the
Spirit, you are not under the Law.”
Knowing that “under the Law”
means being subject to the Torah’s penalties
allows this verse to make much more sense to us
as Messianics. If you are truly led by God’s
Holy Spirit, then you are not subject to the
Torah’s penalties. If you are truly led by the
Spirit, then you will not be led to disobey the
Lord and be cursed, erecting spiritual barriers
between yourself and God. Rather, if you are
truly led by the Spirit, you will naturally obey
our Heavenly Father and obey the commandments of
Torah and be blessed—just as the Torah tells us.
Are you “under the Law”?
Take to serious heart the words
of Deuteronomy 27:26: “‘Cursed is he who does
not confirm the words of this law by doing
them.’ And all the people shall say, ‘Amen.’”
The Hebrew verb translated “cursed” is arar
(rra).
TWOT
indicates “that
the majority of ‘curse’ sayings with ‘ārar fall
into one of three general categories: (1) the
declaration of punishments…(2) the utterance of
[something]...(3) the proclamation of laws…It is
interesting that all these curse-sayings are
a reflex of one violating his relationship to
God.”[32]
In other words, it is quite clear that when we
violate the commandments of the Torah and fail
to abide by its guidelines, that we damage the
relationship with our Heavenly Father that we
should be having. Disobedience to the Lord
certainly does not help the communion that we
should be having with Him!
Yeshua the Messiah came to free
us from slavery to sin and from the curse of the
Torah upon sinners: “Messiah redeemed us from
the curse of the Law, having become a curse for
us—for it is written, ‘Cursed is everyone who hangs on a tree’” (Galatians 3:13).
Paul tells us in Colossians 2:13-14, “When you
were dead in your transgressions and the
uncircumcision of your flesh, He made you alive
together with Him, having forgiven us all our
transgressions, having canceled out the
certificate of debt consisting of decrees
against us, which was hostile to us; and He has
taken it out of the way, having nailed it to the
cross.” Contrary to popular belief, “the
certificate of debt consisting of decrees
against us”[33]
is not the Torah, but is rather the curse
pronounced in the Torah against sinners.
Those who have received Yeshua into their lives
and have been forgiven of their sin are not
“under the Law” or subject to “the curse of the
Law.” But even so, this gives us no reason
to disobey God—for obedience brings blessings
and disobedience brings cursing. When we disobey
our Father we damage the relationship that we
have, or should be having, with Him.
So what do you have to change in
your life so you can find yourself in obedience
to the Lord and hence not “under the
Law”—subject to its penalties?
In our day and age, our Heavenly
Father is doing new and exciting things through
the prophesied restoration of all Israel, as
more and more Believers are drawn to their
Hebraic Roots and a Torah obedient lifestyle.
The Messianic movement is growing. The
prophecies tell us that when all Israel is
restored, “My servant David will be king over
them, and they will all have one shepherd; and
they will walk in My ordinances and keep My
statutes and observe them” (Ezekiel 37:24). The
heart of our Heavenly Father is that we
demonstrate our love for Him and obey Him: “Oh
that they had such a heart in them, that they
would fear Me and keep all My commandments
always, that it may be well with them and with
their sons forever!” (Deuteronomy 5:29).
Do we want to be blessed or do we
want to be cursed? Do we want to have the best
relationship with our Father as is possible? Or
do we want to have a strained relationship?
Consider these questions as you
ponder whether or not following the Torah is
important.
J.K. McKee (B.A., University of Oklahoma; M.A. Student, Asbury
Theological Seminary) is the editor of TNN Online (www.tnnonline.net)
and is a Messianic apologist. He is author of several books,
including: The New Testament Validates Torah, Torah In the
Balance, Volume I, and When Will the Messiah Return?.
He has also written many articles on the Two Houses of Israel
and Biblical theology, and is presently focusing on Messianic
commentaries on various books of the Bible.
NOTES
[1]
Conservative, i.e., the Messianic
groupings that do not have
considerable attachments to
mainstream Christianity and
encourage Torah observance, rather
than dismiss the Torah as
unnecessary or unimportant.
[2]
Of course, we do note
that in our experience as a
Messianic ministry that we have
encountered Christians who are not
interested in polite, reasoned
dialogue either, but rather in
harassing debate. Dealing with these
sorts of individuals is often a
fruitless endeavor.
[3]
Francis Brown, S.R.
Driver, and Charles A. Briggs,
Hebrew and English Lexicon of the
Old Testament (Oxford: Clarendon
Press, 1979), 871.
[4]
Ibid., 878.
[5]
Ibid., 53.
[6]
Matthew 22:23.
[7]
It is said the Oral
Torah was given to Moses, but this
is certainly debatable. Some oral
teaching or instruction was
certainly given to Moses that over
time has been added to. The Mishnah
contains valuable commentary on the
Torah and historical information
that should be consulted in
theological exegesis, but
undoubtedly should not be blindly
followed.
[8]
Frederick William
Danker, ed., et. al.,
A Greek-English
Lexicon of the New Testament and
Other Early Christian Literature,
third edition (Chicago: University
of Chicago Press, 2000), 522.
[9]
Joseph H. Thayer,
Thayer’s Greek-English Lexicon of
the New Testament (Peabody, MA:
Hendrickson, 2003), pp 517-518.
[10]
Ibid., 115.
[11]
Spiros Zodhiates,
ed., Complete Word Study
Dictionary: New Testament
(Chattanooga: AMG Publishers, 1993),
561.
[12]
Romans 2:12; 3:19;
6:14-15; 1 Corinthians 9:20-21;
Galatians 3:23; 4:4-5, 21; 5:18.
[13]
John A. Whitmer,
“Romans,” in John F. Walvoord and
Roy B. Zuck, eds., The Bible
Knowledge Commentary: New Testament
(Wheaton, IL: Victor Books, 1983),
464.
[14]
Ibid.
[15]
David H. Stern,
trans., Jewish New Testament
(Clarksville, MD: Jewish New
Testament Publications, 1995), xxiv.
[16]
David H. Stern,
New Testament Commentary
(Clarksville, MD: Jewish New
Testament Publications, 1995), 374.
[17]
Ariel and D’vorah
Berkowitz, Torah Rediscovered
(Lakewood, CO: First Fruits of Zion,
1996), 7.
[18]
Ibid., 113.
[19]
BDB,
435.
[20]
The NJPS version of
the Tanach consistently renders
torah as “Teaching.”
[21]
Barclay M. Newman,
Jr., A Concise Greek-English
Dictionary of the New Testament
(Stuttgart: United Bible Societies/Deutche
Bibelgesellschaft, 1971), 188.
[22]
Zodhiates,
Complete Word Study Dictionary: New
Testament, 1015.
[23]
W.E. Vine, Vine’s
Expository Dictionary of New
Testament Words (Nashville:
Thomas Nelson, 1968), 643.
[24]
Modern Hebrew
translations of the New Testament
render hupo nomon as yad
ha’Torah (hrATh-dy),
which would literally mean “hand of
the Torah,” understood as meaning
the power of the Torah and being
subjected and obedient to it. This
is a problematic translation because
mattah (hJm)
or tachat (txT),
more accurately mean “under” or
“beneath.”
[25]
Plato: Gorgias,
trans., James H. Nichols, Jr.
(Ithaca and London: Cornell
University, 1998), 73, fn 69.
[26]
H.G. Lidell and R.
Scott, An Intermediate
Greek-English Lexicon (Oxford:
Clarendon Press, 1994),
74.
[27]
Thayer,
527.
[28]
Zodhiates,
Complete Word Study Dictionary: New
Testament, 1422.
[29]
Ibid., 591.
[30]
Grk. phroureō
(frourew),
meaning “to maintain a watch,
guard” or “to provide security,
guard, protect, keep” (BDAG,
pp 1066-1067).
[31]
The issue of
circumcision is thoroughly addressed
in the author’s article “Is
Circumcision for Everyone?”
Also consult his commentary
Galatians for
the Practical Messianic.
[32]
Victor P. Hamilton, “rra,”
in R. Laird Harris, Gleason L.
Archer, Jr., and Bruce K. Waltke,
eds., Theological Wordbook of the
Old Testament (Chicago: Moody
Press, 1980), 1:75.
[33]
Grk. cheirographon (ceirografon);
“The meaning in Col. 2:14…is a
‘promissory note.’ God cancels the
bond that lies to our charge…It is
the debt that we have incurred with
God. The forgiveness of sins (v. 13)
through identification with Christ
in his vicarious death and
resurrection means that this note is
cancelled; God has set it aside and
nailed it to the cross” (E. Lohse, “cheirógraphon,
in Geoffrey W. Bromiley, ed.,
Theological Dictionary of the New
Testament, abrid. [Grand Rapids:
Eerdmans, 1985], 1312).
|