|

POSTED
01 DECEMBER, 2003
Chanukah for the Two Houses of Israel
by
J.K. McKee
editor@tnnonline.net
The subject of what Messianic Believers are to be doing for the
Winter holiday season can be very controversial.[1]
On the one hand, Messianics should not really be
celebrating Christmas, because it is
non-Biblical and was created to be one
replacement for observing the appointed times of
Leviticus 23. On the other hand, should
Messianic Believers celebrate Chanukah (hKnx), or the Feast of Dedication? Within the
emerging Two-House Messianic sub-movement, as it
is often labeled, there is debate over whether
or not people should celebrate Chanukah.
Primarily the debate surrounds the fact that
often the celebration of Chanukah can
become a replacement for Christmas, and that
Chanukah is not a Biblically-mandated
holiday, as it is not in the Leviticus 23 list.
If there is anything we must consider regarding this issue it is
two things: (1) We must have an attitude that
brings glory to our Heavenly Father, and (2) our
actions must foster unity and understanding
between Jewish and non-Jewish Believers. Sadly,
like many of the issues that we face, the
subject of whether or not we should celebrate
Chanukah has two extremes. There are those
who vehemently oppose its observance, and
perhaps might even consider it a “gross Jewish
error.” And, there are those who go overboard in
encouraging its celebration, in an effort to
prove that they are “better” than Christians who
celebrate Christmas in ignorance. Neither one of
these positions is right.
In this article, we examine the historical origins of the
celebration known as Chanukah,
Chanukah and Yeshua, and Chanukah as
a special time for those who believe in the
end-time restoration of all Israel.
The Prophecies of Daniel and the Rise of
Antiochus
Before we can examine the issues pertaining to the celebration of
Chanukah, we must first understand its
historical origins, which actually precede the
time of the Maccabees in Second Century B.C.E.
Israel, going back much further to the exile of
the Southern Kingdom to Babylon in the 500s
B.C.E. While in Babylon, the Prophet Daniel was
shown visions of the future, which included both
the immediate future concerning his time as
Babylon would be overtaken by Persia, as well as
the far distant future. One of these prophecies
included the vision of the four beasts,
representative of the empires of Babylon,
Persia, Greece, and Rome (and revived Rome in
the end-times). The third kingdom, Greece (Heb.
Yavan,
!wy),
would arise and would conquer the Persians:
“The he-goat, the kingdom of Greece, and the large horn that is
between its eyes is its first king” (Daniel
8:21).
Many conservative expositors are agreed that this prophecy is a
reference to Alexander the Great, the Macedonian
king whose father Philip II had conquered the
Greek Peloponnesus. Alexander continued his
father’s legacy by extending his military
campaign into Asia Minor, Egypt, Persia, and all
the way into India. Alexander, however, died at
the age of 33 in 323 B.C.E. in Babylon. After
his death, his empire was divided among his four
generals who took control of Macedonia, the
Greek Peloponnesus, Egypt, and Syria. It is not
surprising to know that ancient history tells us
that these four kingdoms became rivals and often
fought among themselves:
“As for the broken one, in whose place four arose, four kingdoms
will arise from one nation, but lacking its
strength” (Daniel 8:22).
A notable part of Alexander’s conquering of the ancient world was
not only the extension of his rule, but also the
exposure of the Greek language and culture into
foreign areas. Macedonia itself, not really
considered to be “Greek” by the Greeks, had been
Hellenized during the childhood of Alexander,
who was tutored by Aristotle. Part of Philip’s,
and later Alexander’s military campaign, was to
spread the way of life that had made Macedonia
the great power that it was. But, not everyone
in the ancient world desired to be Hellenized or
forced to become like the Greeks.
Prior to Alexander the Great, the Southern Kingdom of Judah
returned from their Babylonian exile to the Land
of Israel. Most of the Northern Kingdom of
Israel/Ephraim had been dispersed into the
ancient world, although some maintained their
Israelite heritage and became assimilated into
the Southern Kingdom. The Jewish province was a
vassal of the Persian Empire, but later became
engulfed into Alexander’s empire and became a
part of Syria. Greek culture was slowly
influencing the Jews, with many Jews abandoning
the Torah and its commandments in favor of Greek
customs and philosophies. It became increasingly
more difficult for the Jews to maintain a
Torah-obedient lifestyle with the policies of
the Syrian Greeks.
Things got out of control when Antiochus IV of the Seleucid dynasty
came to power (175-164 B.C.E.). He was actually
called Epiphanes or “God manifest.”[2]
Antiochus made it illegal for the Jews to
practice the Torah, perform circumcision, follow
the kosher laws, and worship in the Temple. He
moved his troops into Jerusalem and had the
Temple desecrated by the sacrificing of a pig,
and by having a statue to the god Zeus erected.
This, and the subsequent and related events
following, are recorded in the Apocrypha in the
Books of 1-4 Maccabees:
“And the king sent letters by messengers to Jerusalem and the
cities of Judah; he directed them to follow
customs strange to the land, to forbid burnt
offerings and sacrifices and drink offerings in
the sanctuary, to profane sabbaths and feasts,
to defile the sanctuary and the priests, to
build altars and sacred precincts and shrines
for idols, to sacrifice swine and unclean
animals, and to leave their sons uncircumcised.
They were to make themselves abominable by
everything unclean and profane, so that they
should forget the law and change all the
ordinances. And whoever does not obey the
command of the king shall die” (1 Maccabees
1:44-50).
It can be rightly assumed that Antiochus was an ambitious man, and
he was making a political power play,
demonstrating that he was more powerful than the
Ptolemaic Greeks of Egypt. After fighting
Ptolemy, he sought to fully control the Land of
Israel and Jerusalem:
“When Antiochus saw that his kingdom was established, he determined
to become king of the land of Egypt, that he
might reign over both kingdoms. So he invaded
Egypt with a strong force, with chariots and
elephants and cavalry and with a large fleet. He
engaged Ptolemy king of Egypt in battle, and
Ptolemy turned and fled before him, and many
were wounded and fell. And they captured the
fortified cities in the land of Egypt, and he
plundered the land of Egypt. After subduing
Egypt, Antiochus returned in the one hundred and
forty-third year. He went up against Israel and
came to Jerusalem with a strong force” (1
Maccabees 1:16-18).
The Maccabean Era
As you can imagine, the actions of Antiochus were not well received
by the majority population of the Land of
Israel. Led by the retired priest Mattathias,
many Jews opposed the oppression of the Syrian
Greek invaders and sought to see them pushed out
of the Land of Israel. Many of the Jews, fearing
for their lives, succumbed to not following the
Torah and would not follow the rite of
circumcision or eat kosher. Many of them adopted
Greek religion and wanted to “blend in.”
As Antiochus’ army entered into the town of Modin, where Mattathias
and his five sons were living, they tried to
persuade them to forsake the Law of Moses and
sacrifice to Greek gods. Mattathias refused to
give into their demands and proclaimed his
loyalty to the God of Israel and to His
Instruction:
“But Mattathias answered and said in a loud voice: ‘Even if all the
nations that live under the rule of the king
obey him, and have chosen to do his
commandments, departing each one from the
religion of his fathers, yet I and my sons and
my brothers will live by the covenant of our
fathers. Far be it from us to desert the law and
the ordinances. We will not obey the king’s
words by turning aside from our religion to the
right hand or to the left’” (1 Maccabees
2:19-22).
Mattathias then declares that any Jew succumbing to these demands
was a traitor to the covenants and to the God of
Israel, and he calls all to join him in a
revolt:
“When he had finished speaking these words, a Jew came forward in
the sight of all to offer sacrifice upon the
altar in Modein, according to the king's
command. When Mattathias saw it, he burned with
zeal and his heart was stirred. He gave vent to
righteous anger; he ran and killed him upon the
altar” (1 Maccabees 2:23-24).
He then began a military revolt against the Syrian Greeks, killing
those who opposed him. His zeal is described
like that of Phinehas in the wilderness:
“Thus he burned with zeal for the law, as Phinehas did against
Zimri the son of Salu. Then Mattathias cried out
in the city with a loud voice, saying: ‘Let
every one who is zealous for the law and
supports the covenant come out with me!’” (1
Maccabees 2:26-27; cf. Numbers 26:7-8).
Mattathias would not live through his campaign to see the final
victory over the Syrian Greek oppressors. The
mantle would pass onto his son, Judas Maccabeus,
who would lead the Jews in a revolt against the
Seleucids that would take around three years. He
was nicknamed Makkabbi (yBKm), which means “hammer.” During this time, a guerilla-type warfare
was carried out against the Syrian Greeks, while
the Jews sought allies in the Egyptian Greeks or
Ptolemies, the Spartans, and the Romans. Their
military challenges and triumphs are detailed
and chronicled in the Apocryphal Books of 1-4
Maccabees.
The rise of Antiochus Epiphanes and the events of the Maccabean Era
were prophesied by Daniel after speaking about
the division of Alexander’s kingdom into four
regions. Daniel rightly prophesied that
Antiochus would arise to expand his own kingdom,
would come against the faithful ones, but would
not die in battle:
“In
the latter period of their rule, when the
transgressors have run their course, a
king will arise, insolent and skilled in
intrigue. His power will be mighty, but not by
his own power, and he will destroy to an
extraordinary degree and prosper and perform
his will; he will destroy mighty men and the
holy people. And through his shrewdness he will
cause deceit to succeed by his influence; and he
will magnify himself in his heart, and he
will destroy many while they are at ease.
He will even oppose the Prince of princes, but
he will be broken without human agency”
(Daniel 8:23-25).
Antiochus was unable to stand against the Jews, many of whom
faithfully resisted any attempt to Hellenize
them, namely getting them to reject the Torah,
circumcision, kosher eating, and the Temple
service, and instead practice Greek religion.
Antiochus believed himself to be a god, but
later wasted away and died not in battle, but
from a flesh-eating disease:
“But the all-seeing Lord, the God of Israel, struck him an
incurable and unseen blow. As soon as he ceased
speaking he was seized with a pain in his bowels
for which there was no relief and with sharp
internal tortures—and that very justly, for he
had tortured the bowels of others with many and
strange inflictions. Yet he did not in any way
stop his insolence, but was even more filled
with arrogance, breathing fire in his rage
against the Jews, and giving orders to hasten
the journey. And so it came about that he fell
out of his chariot as it was rushing along, and
the fall was so hard as to torture every limb of
his body. Thus he who had just been thinking
that he could command the waves of the sea, in
his superhuman arrogance, and imagining that he
could weigh the high mountains in a balance, was
brought down to earth and carried in a litter,
making the power of God manifest to all. And so
the ungodly man's body swarmed with worms, and
while he was still living in anguish and pain,
his flesh rotted away, and because of his stench
the whole army felt revulsion at his decay” (2
Maccabees 9:5-9).
The Miracle of the Oil
The Maccabees drove the Seleucids out of the Land of Israel in the
month of Kislev 165 B.C.E., which is in about
the month of December. They had the task of
cleaning up the mess that the Seleucids had
left, notably in the city of Jerusalem and in
the Temple complex. Antiochus’ forces had
completely ransacked the Temple and made it into
a haven of idolatry. The Temple needed to be
cleansed of its defilement and restored to its
previous sanctity so proper sacrifices could
once again be performed. Of all of the items of
Temple furniture that had to be cleansed and
rededicated, one of the most important was the
great lampstand or menorah (hrAnm). The menorah required special
consecrated oil in order to be lit.
As many of you are no doubt aware, modern observance of Chanukah
is commemorated by the lighting of a chanukia,
or a special nine-branched menorah. This
is different from the menorah that was in
the Temple that had seven branches. It is used
because when the Temple was rededicated there
was only enough oil to be lit for one day.
However, the oil remained lit for eight days,
allowing time for newly consecrated oil to be
produced. Today a ninth candle or servant candle
is used to light the eight candles of the
chanukia to commemorate the eight days the
menorah was lit. Chanukah (hKnx), meaning “dedication,” became the
nation’s commemoration of this miracle. The
miracle of the eight days of oil is spoken of in
the Talmud:
“What’s
the point of Hanukkah?
It is in line with what our rabbis have taught
on Tannaite authority:
On the twenty-fifth of Kislev the days of
Hanukkah, which are eight, begin. On these days
it is forbidden to lament the dead and to fast.
“For when the Greeks entered the sanctuary, they
made all of the oil that was in the sanctuary
unclean. But when the rule of the Hasmonean
house took hold and they conquered them, they
searched but found only a single jar of oil,
lying with the seal of the high priest. But that
jar had enough oil only for a single day. But
there was a miracle done with it, and they lit
the lamp with it for eight days. The next year
they assigned these days and made them festival
days for the recitation of Hallel psalms [Psa.
113-118] and for thanksgiving” (b.Shabbat 21b).[3]
What would have happened if the Maccabees had not stood up to
Antiochus and his armies? Not only would they
have succeeded in wiping out the Jewish people,
either through military defeat or cultural
assimilation—but Israel, in any form,
would not have existed to give rise to Messiah
Yeshua. We have ample reasons to celebrate
Chanukah as Believers in Yeshua today—the
foremost of which being that if the miracle of
Chanukah had not taken place, there
would be no miracle of Yeshua!
Chanukah and Yeshua
But what about Yeshua the Messiah? As Chanukah was
established as a celebration in the mid-Second
Century B.C.E., did our Lord and Savior
celebrate it?
John 10:22 tells us, “Then came Hanukkah in Yerushalayim. It was
winter” (CJB). The Greek source text actually
uses the word egkainia (egkainia), which in most Bibles is rendered as the
“Feast of Dedication.” BDAG defines it
clearly as “festival of rededication…known
also as Hanukkah and the Feast of Lights, beg.
the 25th of Chislev (roughly=November-December)
to commemorate the purification of the temple by
Judas Maccabaeus on that date in 165 B.C.”[4]
So what was Yeshua doing in Jerusalem during this time?
“[I]t
was winter, and Yeshua was walking in the temple
in the portico of Solomon. The Jews then
gathered around Him, and were saying to Him,
‘How long will You keep us in suspense? If You
are the Messiah, tell us plainly.’ Yeshua
answered them, ‘I told you, and you do not
believe; the works that I do in My Father's
name, these testify of Me. But you do not
believe because you are not of My sheep. My
sheep hear My voice, and I know them, and they
follow Me; and I give eternal life to them, and
they will never perish; and no one will snatch
them out of My hand. My Father, who has given
them to Me, is greater than all; and no one
is able to snatch them out of the
Father's hand. I and the Father are one.’ The
Jews picked up stones again to stone Him’”
(John 10:23-31).
Yeshua was present in Jerusalem during Chanukah. We may
assume by His presence in the holy city that He
was celebrating whatever was commemorated at
that time. Notice that during Chanukah
some Jews ask Him if He was the Messiah. Yeshua
tells them that He has already demonstrated His
Messiahship to them by His actions and that they
do not believe. The quintessential statement
made here is “I and the Father are one.” The
Hebrew word for “one” used frequently in the
Tanach is echad (dxa), and its Greek equivalent is heis (eiß). Echad is used in the Shema of
Deuteronomy 6:4: “Hear, O Israel! The
Lord
is our God, the
Lord
is one!” In proclaiming that He and the Father
are one, Yeshua was proclaiming Himself to be
Divine and to be of the same substance as God.
By doing so, the Jews present wanted to stone
Him as they believed He was committing
blasphemy.
Celebrating Chanukah and understanding that Yeshua was in
Jerusalem at this time is very important. It is
especially important when we understand what
Yeshua was doing and the questions that He was
asked regarding His mission.
Chanukah and Scattered Ephraim
But what about Chanukah and the scattered House of
Israel/Ephraim? This is a question asked by many
in today’s Messianic Two-House sub-movement,
usually causing people to frown on Chanukah.
The events surrounding the Maccabees and the
rededication of the Temple in the Second Century
B.C.E. primarily pertain to the Jewish people,
right? The Northern Kingdom of Israel/Ephraim
had been well scattered into the nations at
least 400 years prior to the events of the
Maccabees. Aside from a few Northern Kingdom
Israelites who had joined themselves to the
Southern Kingdom of Judah (i.e.,
Tobit 1:3-4;
Luke 2:36), there were no Northern Kingdom
Israelites involved with the Maccabean revolt or
any of these events. Or were there?
The reason that there are no Northern Kingdom Israelites
specifically mentioned in the account of the
Maccabees has many non-Jewish Believers in the
Two-House Messianic sub-movement wondering if
the celebration of Chanukah is justified
for them. This is because, believing themselves
to possibly be of scattered Israel/Ephraim, they
feel left out, as the focus on Chanukah
is largely on the Jewish people. Others, because
of Jewish pride that can possibly evidence
itself in some, are offended at Chanukah
and want nothing to do with it.
Neither attitude is fostering unity in the
broader Messianic community today.
The Jewish people have been the only faithful
torchbearer of being recognizable Israel
since the dispersion of the Northern Kingdom of
Israel/Ephraim in 722-721 B.C.E. by Assyria. Our
Jewish brethren have experienced many
dispersions, persecutions, excommunications,
forced relocations, pogroms, and a Holocaust.
Yet, because of the tenacity of the Maccabees,
and many other figures in Jewish history, they
have remained faithful to the Torah and to the
oracles of God. Non-Jewish Believers in the
Messianic community today should be very
thankful to rejoice in these Jewish
triumphs—because they are all our
triumphs. Furthermore, if we examine the account
of the Maccabees, we will find that there were
probably a few scattered Northern Kingdom
Israelites involved in the events.
Consider the fact that in the Biblical record, it is attested by
the Jewish religious leaders that there were
scattered Israelites among the Greeks. Various
Jews in the Land of Israel asked questions among
themselves about Yeshua’s ministry: “The
Jews then said to one another, ‘Where does this
man intend to go that we will not find Him? He
is not intending to go to the Dispersion among
the Greeks,[5]
and teach the Greeks, is He?’” (John 7:35).[6]
Certainly, as we know that the seed of scattered
Israel/Ephraim would be “a multitude of nations”
(Genesis 48:19), we cannot limit these nations
to any exclusive nationality. They were to
become engulfed among the Gentiles and many
would become indistinguishable from the Gentiles
(cf. Amos 9:8-9). However, the Greeks are
pointed out by name as being one of those
nationalities. It is only to be expected, as
when the Northern Kingdom was under siege, many
of those people no doubt left the Land of Israel
to avoid capture. One of the first places they
could have escaped to would have been to
territory immediately north and northwest, i.e.,
Asia Minor and the Greek Peloponnesus. An
argument could be made that these people,
although mostly rebellious against the Torah and
the ways of the Lord, took some godly wisdom
with them that might have influenced classical
Greece of the Sixth-Fifth Centuries B.C.E.,
which emerged approximately 100 years following
the conquering of the Northern Kingdom.
Another important reference occurs in 1 Maccabees 12:6, 19-21. The
high priest Jonathan desired to renew a previous
alliance made with the Spartans, which had been
one of the dominant Greek city-states and a
rival of the Seleucids, the Syrian Greeks:
“Jonathan the high priest, the senate of the
nation, the priests, and the rest of the Jewish
people to their brethren the Spartans,
greeting…This is a copy of the letter which they
[the Spartans] sent to Onias: ‘Arius, king of
the Spartans, to Onias the high priest,
greeting. It has been found in writing
concerning the Spartans and the Jews that they
are brethren and are of the family of Abraham’”
(cf. 1 Maccabees 14:20). The Apocryphal record
here records an ancient view among some Jews
that the Spartans were of “the race of Abraham”
(New Jerusalem Bible).[7]
If it is indeed true that either the Spartans or the Temple
priesthood had documentation, proving that there
might have been people from the scattered tribes
of the Northern Kingdom present in the Greek
areas—having become intermarried and culturally
assimilated—then some were indeed involved in
the events of the Maccabees. Sadly, many of
them would have been involved in the suppression
of the Jews and the defilement of the Temple.
Consider the fact that one of the reasons that
Jews have a great disdain of swine and pork is
because of what happened to the Temple.
Alfred J. Kolatch states in The Second Jewish
Book of Why, “scholars have associated the
deep Jewish aversion to the pig with the
Hasmonean period in Jewish history (second
century B.C.E.) when the Syrian-Greeks, led by
Antiochus Epiphanes, dominated the Palestine
scene and tried to force Jews to sacrifice pigs
in the Temple and to eat of their flesh.”[8]
This is one of the major errors of Ephraim as seen in the Prophets:
“They shall not live in the land of [the
Lord]. But Ephraim shall return to Egypt, and they shall eat
unclean things in Assyria[9]”
(Hosea 9:3, LITV). The House of Israel/Ephraim
is said to have a tendency toward unclean things
in the Scriptures.
If there is anything that non-Jewish Messianic Believers must
understand in regard to Chanukah, it is
that Chanukah is the Festival of
Dedication. It should not only be a time for us
all to rededicate ourselves to the Lord and to
confess sin and cleanse ourselves of
unrighteousness, but it should also be a time
for non-Jewish Believers to reconcile with their
Jewish brethren. Non-Jewish Believers need to
ask for forgiveness from their Jewish brethren,
as though they were the ones who defiled the
Temple and sacrificed pigs on the altar. They
need to realize that if it had not been for the
steadfastness of Mattathais and his sons, there
would have been no operating Temple during the
time of Yeshua. The Jews might have been
assimilated into the Seleucid Syrian Greek
milieu, and there would be no recognizable
remnant of Israel today. We all must rejoice in
the triumph of our Jewish brethren over evil and
pledge ourselves to stand by their side!
Today’s Dilemma: Encountering Hellenism
One of today’s serious dilemmas is how Chanukah is handled
in the Two-House Messianic sub-movement. Because
Chanukah often occurs in close proximity
to Christmas, many people say Chanukah is
a more Biblical celebration than Christmas, even
though neither holiday is mandated in Scripture.
Many, in wanting to expose the questionable
nature of the Christmas tree, become vehemently
opposed to commemorating the birth of Messiah
Yeshua. Certainly, if Yeshua’s birth is to be
commemorated, it would be appropriate to
remember it during the actual time of His actual
birth (which some Messianics are agreed was
during Sukkot or Tabernacles, making His
conception sometime around Chanukah).[10]
But celebration of Chanukah should not be
viewed as a replacement for Christmas.
Celebrating Chanukah should be an
occasion where we rededicate ourselves to God
and to one another, as the Maccabees did to the
Temple some 2,200 years ago.
Another serious problem is that Chanukah often becomes a
time for unwarranted “Greek bashing,” which
oftentimes manifests itself in criticism and
denial of the inspiration of the Greek Apostolic
Scriptures. Hellenism, or Greek philosophy, is
by no means something that we endorse, but
definitions of Hellenism vary. As it concerns
the time of the Maccabees, there are some very
distinct definitions of Hellenism that must be
taken into account that the Seleucid Greeks
forced upon the Jews:
“And the king sent letters by messengers to Jerusalem and the
cities of Judah; he directed them to follow
customs strange to the land, to forbid burnt
offerings and sacrifices and drink offerings in
the sanctuary, to profane sabbaths and feasts,
to defile the sanctuary and the priests, to
build altars and sacred precincts and shrines
for idols, to sacrifice swine and unclean
animals, and to leave their sons uncircumcised.
They were to make themselves abominable by
everything unclean and profane, so that they
should forget the law and change all the
ordinances. And whoever does not obey the
command of the king shall die” (1 Maccabees
1:44-50).
The Hellenism that the Maccabees fought against included:
·
Following the Greek religion, which included the worship of
multiple gods and images, and making
sacrifices to them with unclean or unfit
animals
·
A prohibition on animal sacrifices and prescribed offerings
according to the Torah
·
A prohibition on keeping the seventh-day Sabbath
·
A prohibition on circumcision
·
A prohibition on studying the Torah and its ordinances, so the
people would forget their covenant status
with the God of Israel
Hellenism, as the Maccabees understood it, included these things.
Are there Christians, and indeed liberal
Messianics, that adhere to some of these things?
Yes. There are those who believe that God’s
Torah is unimportant, that the seventh-day
Sabbath was done away with, that eating kosher
is unimportant, that circumcision is
unimportant, and that the significance of the
Temple service is unimportant. I am not one
of those who believes these things to be
unimportant. These things are being restored
to and appreciated once again in the Body of
Messiah as we approach the Lord’s return.
However, in fair balance to First Century history and the time of
Yeshua, the Greek language and Greek philosophy
did exist in the world of the Messiah. Hebrew
and Aramaic were the local languages of the Land
of Israel, but Greek became the standardized
language of the Eastern Mediterranean and of
business on the street. NIDB states it
correctly in saying, “The fact that Greek became
the language of literature and commerce
throughout the ‘inhabited world,’ for example,
was of inestimable importance to the spread of
the gospel.”[11]
If it had not been for Alexander the Great, the
Apostles would have had a very difficult time in
going out on missionary journeys, as there would
have been a whole host of local languages they
would have had to learn, rather than one
standardized international language. A Greek
translation of the Hebrew Bible, the Septuagint,
was widely disseminated and was helpful in
seeing many non-Jews convert to Judaism, or at
least hear about the God of Israel, prior to the
First Coming of Yeshua.[12]
The use of Greek in the First Century is no different than how the
expansion of the British Empire in the
Nineteenth Century, and American television in
the Twentieth Century, have helped make English
the dominant international language of today. We
should be thankful that English has the
widespread usage that it has today; otherwise
the restorations that are being accomplished to
the Body of Messiah may not be taking place as
easily as they are through communication with
Believers worldwide.
Our Chanukah celebrations should not be a time for “Greek
bashing.” Those who would do so need to
understand the complex history of the ancient
world a little better.[13]
Our Chanukah celebrations need to focus
on the unity of all of Israel, that non-Jewish
Messianic Believers need to repent of sins and
rededicate themselves to the Lord and to their
Jewish brethren, and that individually we need
to clean our personal temples of any defilements
that we may have.
Moving Ahead
As we focus on the Festival of Lights, we must not forget the Light
of the World, Messiah Yeshua, and we must not
forget the hardships and trials that the Jewish
people have had to endure. We must be inspired
by the dedication of the Maccabees to stand,
fight, and even die for the truth of God. We
must not succumb to the temptations of the
popular culture, but stand for what we know is
right, just, and godly. As all Israel is in the
process of being reunited, non-Jewish Believers
must remember their position, and the potential
involvement of some scattered and assimilated
Northern Kingdom Israelites in the events of the
Maccabees. They must repent for past sins of
persecution of the Jewish people. In a similar
manner, Jewish Believers must recognize such
repentance as legitimate, graciously accept the
requests for forgiveness, and welcome them as
equals into the fold of Israel’s Commonwealth
(Ephesians 2:11-12; 3:6).
All of us must join together and rejoice in the miracle that the
Lord God performed those many centuries ago as
the menorah remained lit for those eight
special days. Chanukah is a great time
for us to contemplate the ongoing
salvation history of our Heavenly
Father, and how we should stand up for Him in
the similar challenges that the world may
present us with today.
J.K. McKee (B.A., University of Oklahoma; M.A., Asbury
Theological Seminary) is the editor of TNN Online (www.tnnonline.net)
and is a Messianic apologist. He is author of several books,
including: The New Testament Validates Torah, Torah In the
Balance, Volume I, and When Will the Messiah Return?.
He has also written many articles on the Two Houses of Israel
and Biblical theology, and is presently focusing on Messianic
commentaries on various books of the Bible.
NOTES
[1]
This article has been reproduced
from the paperback edition of the
Messianic
Winter Holiday Helper,
pp 19-30.
[2]
Grk. Antiochos
Ephiphanēs (Antiocoß
Epifanhß);
epiphanēs actually means “coming
to light, appearing,
of gods” (H.G.
Lidell, and R. Scott, An
Intermediate Greek-English Lexicon
[Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1994],
306).
[3]
The Babylonian
Talmud: A Translation and
Commentary.
MS Windows XP.
Peabody, MA: Hendrickson, 2005.
CD-ROM.
[4]
Frederick William
Danker, ed., et. al.,
A Greek-English
Lexicon of the New Testament and
Other Early Christian Literature,
third edition (Chicago: University
of Chicago Press, 2000), 272.
[5]
Grk. eis tēn
diasporan tōn Hellēnōn (eiß
thn diasporan twn Ellhnwn).
This is not just speaking of the
Jewish Diaspora in Greek areas, but
more specifically “the dispersion of
the Greeks” (YLT).
[6]
This is not speaking
of Hellenistic Jews. F.F. Bruce
points out: “was he conceivably
thinking of a mission among the
pagan Greeks themselves? In
recording this remark, the
Evangelist probably anticipates
deliberately the implied invitation
conveyed by Jesus to the Greeks who
attended the Passover celebrations
in Jerusalem six months later (John
12:20 ff). Little did their speakers
know that, while Jesus was not to go
in person among the Greeks, his
followers would be numbered in the
tens of thousands in the Greek lands
in a few years’ time” (The Gospel
of John [Grand Rapids: Eerdmans,
1983], 180).
[7]
Grk. ek genous Abraam (ek
genouß
Abraam).
ISBE
further summarizes: “The Maccabean
Jews made further contacts with
Sparta ca. 146 B.C., when
Jonathan sought to develop earlier
relationships (1 Macc. 12:6-18; cf.
Josephus Ant. xiii.5.8 [164];
xii.4.10 [225]). His letter and the
reply to it have been regarded in
some circles as inauthentic. If,
however, the letter to the Roman
proconsul Lucius to the pharaoh of
Egypt is genuine, which mentions
that a Jewish envoy was attempting
to renew a friendship between the
Jews and the Romans (1 Macc.
15:16-21), then the document from
Jonathan to the Spartans may be
authentic also” (L. Hunt, “Sparta,”
in Geoffrey W. Bromiley, ed. et.
al., International Standard Bible
Encyclopedia, 4 vols. [Grand
Rapids: Eerdmans, 1988], 4:593).
[8]
Alfred J. Kolatch,
The Second Jewish Book of Why
(Middle Village, NY: Jonathan David
Publishers, 1985), 318.
[9]
Heb. u’b’Asshur
tamei yo’keilu (Wlkay
amj rWVabW).
[10]
Even trying to
remember Yeshua’s birth at
Tabernacles has been met with a
great deal of resistance. Indeed,
probably the “safest” time to
address the subject is when
Shemot (Exodus 1:1-6:1) appears
in the yearly Torah cycle, as
parallels between Moses’ birth and
Yeshua’s birth in the Gospels can be
considered.
[11]
Brewster Porcella,
“Alexander the Great,” in Merrill C.
Tenney, ed., New International
Dictionary of the Bible (Grand
Rapids: Zondervan, 1987), 33.
[12]
Consult Tim Hegg,
The Letter Writer (Littleton,
CO: First Fruits of Zion, 2002), pp
39-42. Hegg suggests that the
Apostle Paul, while being a
Rabbinical scholar and student of
the Jewish Sage Gamaliel, likely
also studied Greek language and
philosophy at the same
Rabbinical school (b.Sotah
9b). If indeed true, this would
correspond with the historical
understanding that Pharisaical
Judaism was an active proselytizing
religion (Yeshua condemned the
leadership’s manner of proselytizing
in Matthew 23:15). Paul would not
have studied Greek language,
philosophy, and culture just for the
sake of learning it, but for the
sake of converting Greek-speakers to
the religion of the God of Israel.
The same should be our goal if any
of us is called to the mission
field: we must know about the people
grouping to whom we are called.
[13]
For a further
discussion, consult the article “The
Role of History in Messianic
Biblical Interpretation”
by J.K. McKee.
|