|

REVISED EDITION
POSTED 30 DECEMBER, 2003
Introduction to Things Messianic
by
J.K. McKee
editor@tnnonline.net
In studying the Bible, many Christians unfortunately find
themselves only reading the New Testament or the Apostolic
Scriptures.[1]
Although these important Scriptures speak of the gospel message,
testify to the works of our Lord Yeshua (Jesus), and speak of
issues that the First Century Believers had to contend with,
these writings comprise less than one-third of the Bible. Those
whose focus is almost exclusively in this part of the
Bible can have an unbalanced approach to our Creator and His
plan for the ages.
Although the Messianic Scriptures were written in Greek,[2]
their very nature is Hebraic. The man who authored more than
half of these writings was the Apostle Paul, a Rabbinical
scholar who studied under Gamaliel (Acts 22:3; Philippians 3:5),
a revered sage of Judaism to this day (b.Megillah 21a).
Our Messiah Himself was a Hebrew, as are many of His expressions
and sayings. Consider the following examples:
“If
your right eye makes you stumble, tear it out and throw it from
you; for it is better for you to lose one of the parts of your
body, than for your whole body to be thrown into hell”
(Matthew 5:29).
“The
eye is the lamp of the body; so then if your eye is clear, your
whole body will be full of light. But if your eye is bad, your
whole body will be full of darkness. If then the light that is
in you is darkness, how great is the darkness!” (Matthew 6:22-23).
The above quotations are just two examples of the Hebraic nature of
our Savior’s teachings. In theological studies they are
generally referred to as Hebraisms or Semitisms in the Biblical
text. For centuries, scholars have debated verses such as those
above. Many have been confused. Do they require such a literal
viewpoint that demands a physical “plucking out of eyes”? Not at
all. To a First Century Jew, the eye can mean more than just an
organ with which one sees. It can be a person’s mind, emotions,
will, or good sense, depending on the context. There can be a
very deep meaning to Yeshua’s statements when one understands
that there is an Hebraic nature behind them. This is where the
Messianic movement steps in and where a First Century Jewish
perspective of the Scriptures is crucial.
Although the Messianic movement is composed of people from many
theological traditions: largely Conservative and Reform Judaism,
and evangelical Christianity, the emphasis concerning the
Hebraic Roots of our faith in the Messiah is very important
concerning the times in which we live. Several decades ago, if
one uttered the name “Yeshua,” very few would have known who, or
for that matter, what the person was talking about. However,
many Christians today are aware of the fact that Yeshua ([Wvy) is the original Hebrew name of the
Messiah.[3]
Why has this come about? Because many now realize the fact
that understanding the Hebraic Roots of our faith is important.
Why is it important to understand the distinctive Hebraic Roots of
our relationship with God? Yeshua the Messiah is returning to
Jerusalem and the gates of New Jerusalem are named after the
Twelve Tribes of Israel (Revelation 21:10-12). The Apostle Paul
himself says that if you are in the Messiah, you are a part of
the Commonwealth of Israel (Ephesians 2:11-12) or the Israel of
God (Galatians 6:16). Our faith in Messiah Yeshua is undeniably
connected to Israel and to the Jewish people, because it did
start as a sect of Second Temple Judaism (cf. Acts 24:14).
Knowing about the origins of our faith is imperative if we are
to return to truly having an “Apostolic” theology.
Knowing about “things Messianic” and distinctively Hebraic is the
first step toward new enrichment of our faith from Genesis to
Revelation. By understanding the Hebraic origins of our faith,
many of the obscure parts of the Apostolic Scriptures (New
Testament) begin to become clear and take on a new depth, as we
consider their background and the lifestyle practices of the
first Believers in Yeshua. They lived out the missional
expectations of the Tanach or Old Testament in evangelizing the
ancient world (Exodus 19:6; Deuteronomy 4:6; Isaiah 42:6; 49:6),
something that we are to surely continue today.
“The Church” (Ekklesia)
Many Christians believe that “the Church” started at Pentecost
following Yeshua’s ascension into Heaven. They believe that “the
Church” is a group of chosen ones separate from Israel, and
perhaps that it is not important to really study the Tanach or
Old Testament, because it does not directly apply to “the
Church.” The Biblical truth is that the called out body of God’s
chosen existed long before this time.
The word “church” never appears in the Greek texts of Scripture.
The word commonly translated as such comes from ekklēsia
(ekklhsia).
LS defines ekklēsia as “an assembly of the
citizens regularly summoned, the legislative assembly” and
“in N.T. the Church, either the body, or the place.”[4]
In the Apostolic Scriptures ekklēsia is used as a term to
define the Body of Messiah, and thus by extension, is rendered
as “church” in most English translations of the New Testament.
TDNT remarks that “Since the NT uses a single term,
translations should also try to do so, but this raises the
question whether ‘church’ or ‘congregation’ is always suitable,
especially in view of the OT use for Israel and the underlying
Hebrew and Aramaic…‘Assembly,’ then, is perhaps the best single
term, particularly as it has both a congregate and an abstract
sense, i.e., for the assembling as well as the assembly.”[5]
This Christian resource says that “assembly” would be the best,
consistent translation for the word ekklēsia.
The Septuagint (LXX), the ancient Greek translation of the Hebrew
Bible, frequently translates the Hebrew word qahal (lhq), or assembly/congregation, as ekklēsia.
Qahal is a Hebrew term for “assembly” or “congregation”
used in the Tanach, which almost exclusively refers to Israel.
TWOT tells us, “usually qāhāl is translated as
ekklēsia in the LXX.”[6]
When the Apostolic writers used the Greek word ekklēsia,
often rendered as “church” in our English Bibles, they did not
see the ekklēsia as a separate assembly or group of
people away from Israel. They considered the ekklēsia to
be Israel, and the non-Jewish Believers to be “fellow heirs”
(Ephesians 3:6) with them. It is not surprising by any means
that one of the definitions given for the word ekklēsia
does in fact include “Israel.” Thayer states that “in the
Sept. [ekklēsia is] often equiv. to
lhq, the assembly of the Israelites.”[7]
It is unfortunate that ekklēsia in most Bibles has been
translated as “church,” whereas it would be best rendered as
either “assembly” or “congregation.”[8]
It is important to know that the ekklēsia or assembly of
God’s chosen has always existed. The Holy Spirit being poured
out at Pentecost was a fulfillment of prophecy, recorded in both
the Tanach (Old Testament) and the Apostolic Scriptures (New
Testament). But the events that occurred on this day did not
start a “new group of elect.” Pentecost, in actuality
Shavuot (tA[buv')
or the Feast of Weeks—one of the Biblical festivals specified in
Leviticus 23—is one of the commanded times of ingathering in the
Torah or Law of Moses (Deuteronomy 16:16). The Apostle Peter
attested that what occurred when the Holy Spirit was poured out
was a fulfillment of prophecy:
“[B]ut
this is what was spoken of through the prophet Joel: ‘And
it shall be in the last days,’ God says, ‘That I will pour forth
of My spirit on all mankind; and your sons and your daughters
shall prophesy, and your young men shall see visions, and your
old men shall dream dreams; even on My bondslaves, both men and
women, I will in those days pour forth of My Spirit and they
shall prophesy. And I will grant wonders in the sky above and
signs on the earth below, blood, and fire, and vapor of smoke.
The sun will be turned into darkness and the moon into blood,
before the great and glorious day of the Lord shall come. And it
shall be that everyone who calls on the name of the Lord will be
saved’” (Acts 2:16-21).
The events at Pentecost/Shavuot were expected in Joel 3:1-4:
“It
will come about after this that I will pour out My Spirit on all
mankind; and your sons and daughters will prophesy, your old men
will dream dreams, your young men will see visions. Even on the
male and female servants I will pour out My Spirit in those
days. I will display wonders in the sky and on the earth, blood,
fire and columns of smoke. The sun will be turned into darkness
and the moon into blood before the great and awesome day of the
Lord comes.”[9]
So did the ekklēsia, or assembly of God’s elect, begin at
Pentecost/Shavuot? All the Book of Acts says is that
there was a fulfillment of prophecies in Joel that will be fully
completed in the Last Days. Interestingly enough, the martyr
Stephen tells us that “the Church” (meaning, God’s elect)
actually existed much earlier at Mount Sinai. In the KJV, he is
recorded as saying, “This is that Moses, which said unto the
children of Israel, A prophet shall the Lord your God raise up
unto you of your brethren, like unto me; him shall ye hear. This
is he, that was in the church in the wilderness[10]
with the angel which spake to him in the mount Sina, and with
our fathers: who received the lively oracles to give unto
us” (Acts 7:37-38). The so-called “Church Age” did not begin in
30 C.E. Yeshua the Messiah only speaks of this age and the age
to come (Matthew 12:32, 13:49; Mark 10:30; Luke 18:30), meaning
the future Messianic Kingdom.
In reference to the Hebraic Roots of our faith, it is important to
remember that the Apostles and the early Believers in the
Messiah were not at all foreign to the Hebrew Bible. Numerous
references to “the Scriptures” in the Apostolic Writings (New
Testament) are referring to the Torah,
Nevi’im, and Ketuvim—or
the Law, the Prophets, and the Writings: the Tanach/Tanakh ($nt). The Gospels, Epistles, and many of the other Messianic Writings
had yet to be canonized or even written when “the Scriptures”
were referred to or appealed to by the Apostles.[11]
When Paul wrote Timothy, “All
Scripture is inspired by God and profitable for teaching, for
reproof, for correction, for training in righteousness” (2
Timothy 3:16), it was the Tanach or Old Testament of which he
was specifically speaking.[12]
As we have previously mentioned, Paul was a Rabbinical scholar
fluent in the Tanach, and when witnessing to fellow Jews in the
Synagogue he would have tried to show them how Yeshua fulfilled
the prophecies and prophetic patterns seen in His life from the
Hebrew Bible. Acts 17:2 records how it was Paul’s frequent
ministry technique to reason with his Jewish brethren on the
Sabbath, proving to them from the Scriptures that Yeshua was the
Messiah: “And
according to Paul's custom, he went to them, and for three
Sabbaths reasoned with them from the Scriptures.”
It is also important to note that prior to 70 C.E., the year the
Romans destroyed Jerusalem, “Christianity” was a legal religion
in the Roman Empire as Rome considered it to be a sect of
Judaism which was exempt from worshipping Caesar. However, as
the Hebrew-Greek Key Study Bible explains, “Jewish
Christians (Messianic believers) were considered to be a sect
(Acts 24:5) of Judaism. But, after A.D. 70, all Christians were
on their own; they were recognized as separate from Judaism.”[13]
After that time, the assembly of Believers steadily distanced
itself from its Hebraic Roots. Much of this was created by Roman
anti-Semitism, and was coupled by the Synagogue authorities
ejecting Believers in Yeshua.[14]
What we know today as “Christianity” originated from First Century
Judaism and has changed tremendously since then. Our faith in
Yeshua the Messiah (Jesus Christ) at its very core is Hebraic.
The Messiah, Yeshua, is an Israelite and is the Lion of the
Tribe of Judah (Revelation 5:4-5). He is coming to reign from
Jerusalem, not Rome as some Catholics might believe or Salt Lake
City as Mormons may espouse.
So why should we study the roots of our faith? You cannot have a
house without a foundation. The foundations of the ekklēsia
pre-Pentecost are definitively Hebraic. It is crucial to
understand the worldview that Yeshua, the Apostles, and the
early Believers in the Messiah had, so we can more fully
understand Scripture as it was originally composed: God-inspired
from an Hebraic world view.
The Jerusalem
Council
In the very early days of the community of Believers following
Pentecost or Shavuot, the vast majority of the Believers
were Jewish. Later, however, the gospel message began to spread
beyond the borders of the Land of Israel. Israel, of course, was
to be a light to the nations, and God’s conduit by which He
would save the world. Israel’s Kingdom could only be restored by
the whole world knowing about the greatness of Israel’s God, and
its Messiah, Yeshua.[15]
As many God-fearing non-Jews came to faith in the Messiah, things
changed substantially. There was debate among many of the Jewish
Believers whether these non-Jews had to be circumcised, becoming
Jewish proselytes or converts, and then receive the Messiah
(Acts 15:4)—or whether they could receive Him directly and then
grow in their faith. It caused a great stir as many believed
that circumcision and observance of the Torah or Law of Moses
had to precede the salvation experience. Acts 15 records the
decisions made by the Jerusalem Council as the goyim (~yAG)
or ethnē (eqnh),
“the nations,” were coming to faith in the Messiah:
“The
apostles and the elders came together to look into this matter.
After there had been much debate, Peter stood up and said to
them, ‘Brethren, you know that in the early days God made a
choice among you, that by my mouth the Gentiles would hear the
word of the gospel and believe. And God, who knows the heart,
testified to them giving them the Holy Spirit, just as He also
did to us; and He made no distinction between us and them,
cleansing their hearts by faith. Now therefore why do you put
God to the test by placing upon the neck of the disciples a yoke
which neither our fathers nor we have been able to bear?’” (Acts 15:6-10).
Before the Council issued its ruling, Peter restates what has
occurred. Previously in Acts 10:9-16, the apostle was shown a
vision of a sheet with animals on it considered unclean by the
Torah’s standards. Peter is told three times to “Get
up, Peter, kill and eat!”
(Acts 10:13), and he responds with, “No,
Lord; for I have never eaten anything that is common or unclean” (Acts 10:14, RSV). This passage is usually interpreted as meaning
that God annulled the dietary requirements of the Torah or Law
of Moses. However, Peter himself gives the appropriate
interpretation of his vision that has nothing to do with meat:
“And
he said to them, ‘You yourselves know how unlawful it is for a
man who is a Jew to associate with a foreigner or to visit him;
and yet God has shown me that I should not call any
man[16]
unholy or unclean’” (Acts 10:28).[17]
In Acts 15:6-11, Peter testifies that the nations have been made
clean by the blood of the Messiah, can receive the same Holy
Spirit, and must come to redeeming faith in the same way as
Jewish Believers. He also emphasizes that “a yoke…which…our
fathers nor we were able to bear” (Acts 15:10, NIV) should not
be put upon them, implying that legalistic or mandatory
observance of the Law of Moses involving circumcision for
salvation and/or for acceptance among the Believers was not
necessary. James the Just, half-brother of Yeshua, issued the
following ruling for the new-Jewish Believers:
“Therefore
it is my judgment that we do not trouble those who are turning
to God from among the Gentiles, but that we write to them that
they abstain from things contaminated by idols and from
fornication and from what is strangled and from blood. For Moses
from ancient generations has in every city those who preach him,
since he is read in the synagogues every Sabbath” (Acts 15:19-21).
Four requirements were given to the new non-Jewish believers in
order for them to congregate with Jewish Believers in the
Messiah:
1.
Abstinence from pollutions of idols
2.
Abstinence from fornication
3.
Abstinence from things strangled
4.
Abstinence from blood
Briefly summarized, Believers from the nations were to avoid idols,
fornication (sexual immorality), meats that were not butchered
in a proper method (Deuteronomy 14:2-20), and blood (Deuteronomy
12:23-25).
Why were the non-Jews coming to faith told to observe these four
things?
“For
Moses from ancient generations has in every city those who
preach him, since he is read in the synagogues every Sabbath”
(Acts 15:21).
The inference is that as born again non-Jews observed these things,
they could enter the synagogues to be taught torah (hrAT) or the Instruction of God as delivered
through the five books of Moses (also commonly called the
Pentateuch). James recognized that the salvation of the nations
was a major part of God’s restoration of the Tabernacle of David
(Acts 15:15-18; cf. Amos 9:11-12, LXX). This would involve God
writing His Torah onto the hearts of His people by His Spirit
(Ezekiel 36:26-27), something which could begin with the
essentials that the Jerusalem Council ruled were necessary (cf.
Acts 15:23-29).
In Ephesians 2:11-16, the Apostle Paul writes that non-Jews who
come to faith in Yeshua have been made a part of the
Commonwealth of Israel:
“Therefore
remember that formerly you, the Gentiles in the flesh, who are
called ‘Uncircumcision’ by the so-called ‘Circumcision,’
which is performed in the flesh by human hands—remember
that you were at that time separate from Messiah, excluded
from the commonwealth of Israel, and strangers to the covenants
of promise, having no hope and without God in the world. But now
in Messiah Yeshua you who formerly were far off have been
brought near by the blood of Messiah. For He Himself is our
peace, who made both groups into one and broke down the
barrier of the dividing wall, by abolishing in His flesh the
enmity, which is the Law of commandments contained
in [dogma],[18]
so that in Himself He might make the two into one new man,
thus establishing peace, and might reconcile them both in
one body to God through the cross, by it having put to death the
enmity.”
Paul says that those who were “separate from Messiah” were “alienated
from the commonwealth of Israel”
(Ephesians 2:12, RSV), but that through the sacrifice of the
Messiah He will make the two into “one
new humanity” (Ephesians 2:15, NRSV/CJB). Ephesians 2:15 tells us that “God
through the cross…
put to death the enmity,”
or sin which has been atoned for through the sacrifice of the
Messiah which once separated God the Father from mankind. All
Believers in Yeshua are a part of the Commonwealth of Israel.
Believers from the nations were, however, warned by the Apostle
Paul not to boast or speak against the Jewish people as the
natural branches. The Jewish people have been preserved by God
as the remnant of Israel since the dispersion of the Northern
Kingdom of Israel in 721-722 B.C.E. As Paul attests, “do
not be arrogant toward the branches; but if you are arrogant,
remember that it is not you who supports the root, but the
root supports you. You will say then, ‘Branches were
broken off so that I might be grafted in.’ Quite right, they
were broken off for their unbelief, but you stand by your faith.
Do not be conceited, but fear; for if God did not spare the
natural branches, He will not spare you, either”
(Romans 11:18-21). No one is to boast against the Jewish people,
because if God can break off natural branches from Israel’s
olive tree in order to save wild branches of the nations, He can
certainly break off the wild branches. The Jewish people, as
Paul is clear, have an irrevocable calling that must be honored
(Romans 11:29).
The roots of our faith come from Israel and ultimately Yeshua, the
Root of all Israel. Non-Jewish Believers who had once been
separate from Israel have nothing to boast about (Romans
11:17-22), but they need to respect those who hold the oracles
of God (Romans 3:2). The Jerusalem Council ruled that there was
no difference between Believers of different ethnic backgrounds
in the Lord, as all are a part of the same Israel and must be
welcome (cf. Galatians 3:28), showing mutual honor to one
another. From that “Israel” comes our Divine Savior, the Messiah
Yeshua.
Roman
Catholicism Takes Its Toll
What we have described concerning the Jerusalem Council is somewhat
different than what is often taught in mainstream Christianity.
Born again Believers are a part of the community of Israel. It
is important to note that there is no reference in Scripture
that the First Century Believers dispensed with the Torah or Law
of Moses, including the seventh-day Sabbath, the appointed times
of Leviticus 23,[19]
and the kosher dietary laws. Rather, in the Apostolic Scriptures
(New Testament) it is made clear that legalistic observance of
the Torah via a conversion to Judaism was not a salvation
requirement, and that no person would gain salvation by keeping
commandments. Yeshua does come first, with the Torah
second as a part of following Him.
But if the First Century ekklēsia was very Hebraic, how did
we get to where we are today? Presumably, these Believers did
not celebrate mainstream Christian practices such as “Sunday
church” or the holidays of Christmas and Easter (at least as we
currently know them).
History records that following the First Council of Nicea in 325
C.E., the institutional Church began passing legislation
prohibiting the keeping of the Sabbath and the Biblical
festivals.[20]
(This is an indication that even up until the Fourth Century
there were some pockets of Believers who were keeping, or at
least nominally keeping, these practices.) When “Christianity”
was made a legal religion in the Roman Empire by Constantine,
syncretism was largely practiced by the clergy, meaning Biblical
concepts were often merged with pagan customs. It ultimately
resulted in the widescale merger of Church authority with
political authority, and the Roman Catholic Church was formed as
a consequence.[21]
Following the fall of Rome in 476 C.E. to the Visigoths, the Dark
Ages began. During this period, Europe experienced one of the
worst times in human history, which the Roman Catholic Church
dominated. One risked death by simply possessing a written copy
of the Holy Scriptures, and disease and plague were rampant.
Europeans were also some of the most uneducated people in the
known world (especially when compared to Jews and Muslims) as
the Roman Catholics held most Biblical, historical, and
philosophical documents solely in their possession. Of
everything that was taught and believed, the most dangerous was
that the Catholic Church held that eternal life or salvation
only came through participation in its sacraments. The pope was
believed to have the authority on Earth to give people exemption
from Divine punishment, or condemn them eternally.[22]
The
Reformation
We truly believe that the Reformation, which began in the early
1500s, was an act of God. German monk Martin Luther could not
reconcile the Biblical concept of “the just shall live by faith”
with the Roman Catholic teaching of salvation via the Church’s
sacraments. History records that his Ninety-Five Theses or
protests against the Catholic Church began the phenomenon we now
call the Protestant Reformation. From that point onward men and
women of God began to read their Bibles and question Roman
Catholic tradition.
The two primary goals of the Reformers were (1) to purge the Church
of non-Biblical Roman Catholic practices, and (2) to present the
general populace a copy of the Scriptures in their native
languages. During this time famous English translations such as
the 1599 Geneva Bible and 1611 King James Bible were produced.
The Biblical realization that salvation came by grace through
faith alone, and not by actions prescribed by the Roman Catholic
Church, was also reestablished. Certainly, the Reformers did not
agree on everything, and many different Protestant sects did
arise. But, had it not been for what they did, we would
certainly not be where we are today.
When we review the current Messianic movement, one must realize
that the Reformation accomplished much, although there are still
areas of Biblical theology that need to be reformed. The
Reformation showed us that the practices of Roman Catholic
ritual confession, praying to the saints, Mary veneration or
worship, and belief in purgatory, were non-Biblical. A few in
the Messianic movement believe the Protestant Reformation was a
failure because Protestants still observe some Roman Catholic
practices. However, would we be better off if the Reformation
had not occurred? Are we not building upon the theology of those
who have gone before us—both Jewish rabbis and Christian
theologians? Today, we benefit from access to Jewish
literature and resources that the early Reformers did not
have access to.[23]
What has the
Messianic movement today achieved?
The Messianic movement today was originally started by Jews who
were Believers in Messiah Yeshua as an evangelistic outreach to
fellow Jews. Many of today’s Messianic congregations, however,
have a mixed group of constituents, including Jews who have
received Yeshua as the Messiah, and others from diverse
Christian backgrounds wanting to enrich their faith. Overall,
the Messianic movement has been responsible for awakening many
Christians to the truly Hebraic origins of their faith.
There are, however, distinctive differences between your average
Messianic congregation and your standard church setting. Just as
there are many types of evangelical Christian churches, there
are a wide variety of Messianic congregations.
One of the most obvious differences between a Messianic
congregation and your average church is that Messianics
typically assemble or hold services on a Friday night or
Saturday in remembrance of the Biblical Sabbath or Shabbat.
Depending on what region of the world in which you live, a
congregation can be very much like an Orthodox Jewish synagogue,
or similar to a standard church setting, with all the variance
you can imagine in between. (Most Messianic congregations are
actually like a Conservative-Reform Jewish synagogue.) Use of
traditional Hebrew liturgy is also not uncommon in Messianic
settings. Some are more charismatic than others, and some are
highly reserved. Again, depending on where you are and what
congregation you are attending, can affect the degree of “Jewishness.”
The Messianic movement has been responsible for awakening many
Believers to the Hebraic Roots of the faith, and continues to
grow larger and larger every year. It is a signal that the
return of the Messiah is drawing closer, as Jewish people come
to saving faith in Yeshua, and many Christians are being
convicted that they need to return to the lifestyle practices of
the First Century saints (cf. Revelation 12:17; 14:12).
Yeshua the Messiah (Jesus Christ) is returning to Jerusalem. He
prophesied that His Twelve Disciples would “sit
upon twelve thrones, judging the twelve tribes of Israel”
(Matthew 19:28). He tells us in Matthew 25:34-46 that people
will be judged for how His Jewish brethren are treated. Yeshua
adamantly states that those who treat the Jewish people badly or
with malice shall go “into everlasting fire, prepared for the
devil and his angels” (Matthew 25:41, KJV). Isaiah 2:3 tells us
that during the Millennium “from Zion the law will come forth,
and the word of the Lord
from Jerusalem” (cf. Micah 2:4). Just knowing about these four
things, is it important to understand Israel and the Hebraic
Roots of our faith? Absolutely!
Each Believer’s goal should be to be as Biblically sound as humanly
possible, Genesis-Revelation and not just
Matthew-Revelation. Understanding the origins and roots of the
relationship with our God, the Holy One of Israel, is a crucial
part of attaining this goal. May you seek a firm foundation as
you grow in your faith and examine His Word for answers!
J.K. McKee (B.A., University of Oklahoma; M.A., Asbury
Theological Seminary) is the editor of TNN Online (www.tnnonline.net)
and is a Messianic apologist. He is author of several books,
including: The New Testament Validates Torah, Torah In the
Balance, Volume I, and When Will the Messiah Return?.
He has also written many articles on the Two Houses of Israel
and Biblical theology, and is presently focusing on Messianic
commentaries on various books of the Bible.
NOTES
[1]
This article has been reproduced from the paperback
edition of
Introduction to Things Messianic,
pp 1-12.
[2]
There is the belief among some in the
Messianic movement that the Apostolic Scriptures were
written in Hebrew. This view, however, is not based in
historical fact. For a further analysis, consult the
publication
Scripture Under Scrutiny: Was the
New Testament Really Written In Hebrew?
by TNN Press.
[3]
The most public usage of the name
“Yeshua” I have seen to date was during Pastor Rick
Warren’s prayer at the inauguration of President Barack
Obama, 20 January, 2009.
[4]
H.G. Lidell and R. Scott, An
Intermediate Greek-English Lexicon (Oxford:
Clarendon Press, 1994), 239.
[5]
K.L. Schmidt, “ekklēsía,” in
Geoffrey W. Bromiley, ed., Theological Dictionary of
the New Testament, abrid. (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans,
1985), 397.
[6]
Jack P. Lewis, “qāhāl,” in R. Laird
Harris, Gleason L. Archer, Jr., and Bruce K. Waltke,
eds., Theological Wordbook of the Old Testament
(Chicago: Moody Press, 1980), 2:790.
[7]
Joseph H. Thayer, Thayer’s
Greek-English Lexicon of the New Testament (Peabody,
MA: Hendrickson, 2003), 196.
[8]
Two Christian translations that render
ekklēsia as “assembly” include Young’s Literal
Translation and the Literal Translation of the Holy
Bible by Jay P. Green.
Do note that the English term “church,”
while not being the best rendering for ekklēsia,
is not a word of pagan origins. Consult the FAQ entry on
the TNN website “Church,
word of pagan origin.”
[9]
There is still obviously future
fulfillment to be expected with this prophecy. Consult
the author’s article “What
Happened to Our Eschatology?”
[10]
Grk. tē ekklēsia en tē erēmō (th
ekklhsia en th erhmw).
[11]
Acts 17:2; 11; 18:24, 28; Romans 15:4;
16:26; 1 Corinthians 15:3-4.
[12]
Walter C. Kaiser considers this verse to
be “One of the strongest statements on the authority and
use of the Old Testament Scriptures” (The
Promise-Plan of God: A Biblical Theology of the Old and
New Testaments [Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 2008],
354).
[13]
Spiros Zodhiates, ed., “Galatians,” in
Hebrew-Greek Key Study Bible, NASB (Chattanooga: AMG
Publishers, 1994), 1548.
[14]
Consult the benediction against heretics,
actually seen in the Jewish siddur until this very day
(Joseph H. Hertz, ed., The Authorised Daily Prayer
Book, revised [New York: Bloch Publishing Company,
1960], 283; Nosson Scherman and Meir Zlotowitz, eds.,
Complete ArtScroll Siddur, Nusach Ashkenaz
[Brooklyn: Mesorah Publications, 1984], 107), and a
summary of early Christian remarks toward the Jewish
people seen in “Jew, Jews,” in David W. Bercot, ed.,
A Dictionary of Early Christian Beliefs (Peabody,
MA: Hendrickson Publishers, 1998), pp 374-378.
[15]
“[I]t is clear that ‘Israel as a light to
the nations’ is no peripheral theme within the canonical
process. The nations are the matrix of Israel’s life,
the raison d’être of her very existence” (Duane L.
Christensen, “Nations,” in David Noel Freedman, ed.,
Anchor Bible Dictionary, 6 vols. [New York:
Doubleday, 1992], 4:1037).
[16]
Grk. mēdena…anthrōpon (mhdena…
anqrwpon);
or “any human being.”
[17]
The Mishnah says in m.Ohalot 18:7,
“Dwelling places of gentiles [in the Land of Israel] are
unclean” (Jacob Neusner, trans., The Mishnah: A New
Translation [New Haven and London: Yale University
Press, 1988], 980), and as such Jews in the Second
Temple period did not often voluntarily associate
themselves with others.
The Greek term athemitos (aqemitoß),
used in Acts 10:28, in most Bibles is rendered as
“unlawful.” It does not mean unlawful in the sense of
something against the Torah. It pertains, rather, “to
not being sanctioned, not allowed, forbidden”
(Frederick
William Danker, ed., et. al.,
A Greek-English Lexicon of the New
Testament and Other Early Christian Literature,
third edition [Chicago: University of Chicago Press,
2000], 850), relating to custom or opinion, as opposed
to something that is Biblical law.
[18]
Grk. dogma (dogma);
most likely relating to “something
that is taught as an established tenet or statement of
belief, doctrine,
dogma”
(BDAG, 254).
This is examined further in the author’s
commentary
Ephesians for the Practical
Messianic, as “the religious
Law of commandments in dogmas” is explained to actually
be man-made regulations responsible for erecting the
dividing wall in the Second Temple, contrary to the
Temple being a place for all to come and commune with
God (i.e., 1 Kings 8:41-43; Isaiah 56:6-7).
[19]
Consult the author’s article “Does
the New Testament Annul the Biblical Appointments?”
[20]
Council of Antioch (341 C.E.), Canon 1;
Council of Laodicea (363 C.E.), Canon 29.
[21]
For a further and more detailed
discussion, consult Chapter 2 of the author’s book
Torah in the Balance, Volume I,
“Maintaining Balance in Our Quest into the Torah.”
[22]
The author recommends you consult Justo
L. González, The Story of Christianity, Vol. 1
(San Francisco: Harper Collins, 1984), and Dale T. Irvin
and Scott W. Sunquist, History of the World Christian
Movement, Vol. 1 (Maryknoll, NY: Orbis Books, 2001),
for a fair analysis of early Church history.
[23]
And for that same matter, access to the
lands of the Bible, secondary historical data and
resources, and disciplines like archaeology, largely
arising in the mid-to-late Nineteenth Century.
Consult K.A. Kitchen, The Bible In Its
World: The Bible & Archaeology Today (Exeter:
Paternoster, 1977), and the author’s article “The Role
of History in Messianic Biblical Interpretation,” for a
further discussion.
|