|

REVISED EDITION
POSTED
04 JANUARY, 2004
When Did "the Church" Begin?
by
J.K. McKee
editor@tnnonline.net
In the annals of Christian teaching, Protestant or Catholic, one
common thread often runs throughout: the institution known as
“the Church” sees itself as being separate from Israel.[1]
As some would dogmatically declare, “The Church is not Israel!”[2]—and depending on your view, this is correct. The Church institution
by-and-large does not consider itself part of, or at times even
related to, Israel. While there are some who do recognize that
our faith is connected to Israel, that is about as far as it
goes. In many ways Christian theologians have incorrectly
“divided” and have mishandled the Word of truth (2 Timothy
2:15), favoring to “pick-and-choose” which Scriptures “apply to
them” and to Israel, leading to inconsistencies regarding their
understanding of the Bible. At times, this causes Bible teachers
to dangerously ignore the Tanach or Old Testament in spiritual
instruction.
Are these observations intended to accuse all Christians of
anti-Semitism or an anti-Israel spirit? Absolutely not.
There are many sincere, born again Christian Believers who do
consider themselves “related” to Israel in some form, and they
are supportive of the Jewish people, the State of Israel, and
interreligious dialogue. Rather, we question the centuries-old
concept of a division or wide gulf being placed between “the
Church” and Israel. As the world gets more and more uncertain
and news stories of Israel, the Middle East, and sermons on the
Second Coming become far too frequent, the question of
ecclesiology, or the study of God’s elect, should become
relevant to the Christian Believer. How is the person who has
put his or her trust in Israel’s Messiah, Yeshua, related to
Israel?
Arguably, the study of the identity of “the Church” might be the
most important doctrine outside that of salvation. This study
determines what group of people, or elect, the born again
Believer belongs to. It has a direct impact on the continued
relevance of the Torah or Law of Moses for Believers, and
whether or not the pre-tribulation rapture teaching is
Scriptural. It also determines whether or not the Believer is a
part of the Commonwealth of Israel, or is separate from it (cf.
Ephesians 2:11-12).
You may wish to consider what the Apostle Paul wrote to Titus:
“For
the grace of God has appeared, bringing salvation to all men,
instructing us to deny ungodliness and worldly desires and to
live sensibly, righteously and godly in the present age, looking
for the blessed hope and the appearing of the glory of our great
God and Savior, Messiah Yeshua, who gave Himself for us to
redeem us from every lawless deed, and to purify for Himself a
people for His own possession, zealous for good deeds”
(Titus 2:11-14; cf. Deuteronomy 4:20; 7:6; 14:2; 16:18).
The Apostle Peter also says:
“This
precious value, then, is for you who believe; but for those who
disbelieve, ‘The stone
which the builders rejected, this became the very corner
stone,’ and, ‘A stone of stumbling and a rock of offense’; for they stumble
because they are disobedient to the word, and to this doom
they were also appointed. But you are
a chosen race, a
royal priesthood, a holy
nation, a people for God's
own possession, so
that you may proclaim the excellencies of Him who has called you
out of darkness into His marvelous light; for you once were
not a people, but
now you are the people of
God; you had not
received mercy, but now you have
received mercy”
(1 Peter 2:7-10; cf. Hosea 1:10-11; 2:23).[3]
If you have noticed closely, both Paul and Peter appropriate
language from the Tanach or Old Testament regarding the calling
of Ancient Israel and apply it to Believers in Yeshua. Why do
they do this? In Deuteronomy 7:6, our Heavenly Father proclaims,
“For
you are a holy people to the
Lord your God; the
Lord your God has
chosen you to be a people for His own possession out of all the
peoples who are on the face of the earth.”
This people, obviously, was Ancient Israel. By the time of the
Messiah’s ministry, neither the Lord’s plan for the world nor
His plan for His people had changed (Malachi 3:6). The Apostles
make it clear that God is seeking “for
himself a people of his own who are zealous for good deeds”
(Titus 2:14, RSV), and they asked Yeshua when He was going to
restore Israel (Acts 1:6).
The key to properly understanding what “the Church” actually is, is
that we must understand the fact that our Father in Heaven is
seeking only one people for His own possession.
This people is obviously the restored Kingdom of God—but it so
happens that it is to be a specific Kingdom called Israel.
God does not have two groups of elect, neither is He a Father of
two sub-families— but rather He intends to have only one
assembly of chosen.
It is necessary that we examine “the Church” versus Israel
dichotomy that exists in many theological circles, and whether
or not the two groups are separate, or are actually one and the
same. In this article we will examine what occurred at
Pentecost, and what Yeshua the Messiah really meant when He said
“upon this rock I will build My church” (Matthew 16:18). Most
important, we seek to determine what the purpose of God’s people
is, firmly establishing that He has but one group of elect.
What is an
ekklesia?
The Greek word commonly translated as “church” in English Bibles
is ekklēsia (ekklhsia).
BDAG indicates that ekklēsia means “a casual
gathering of people, an assemblage, gathering,” and “people
with shared belief, community, congregation.”[4]
It notes that “the term” ekklēsia “apparently became
popular among Christians in Greek-speaking areas for chiefly two
reasons: to affirm continuity with Israel through use of a term
found in Gk. translations of the Hebrew Scriptures, and to allay
any suspicion, esp. in political circles, that Christians were a
disorderly group.”[5]
The primary Hebrew equivalent of ekklēsia is qahal
(lhq). BDB indicates that qahal means
“assembly, convocation, congregation.”[6]
In the Greek Septuagint, or ancient translation of the Hebrew
Scriptures produced approximately three centuries before the
Messiah, the term qahal is usually translated as
ekklēsia, the same term appearing in the Apostolic
Scriptures (New Testament) translated into English as “church.”[7]
What is important to note is that the ekklēsia, or
congregation/assembly of the Septuagint, is Israel—and the
Apostles’ usage of ekklēsia is intended to connect one
back to the qahal Yisrael (larfy
lhq)
of the Old Testament. In Acts 7:23-39, Stephen specifically
equates the ekklēsia or “church” as being Israel:
“This is that Moses, which said unto the children of Israel, a
prophet shall the Lord your God raise up unto you of your
brethren, like unto me; him shall ye hear. This is he, that was
in the church [ekklēsia] in the wilderness
with the angel which spake to him in the mount Sina, and with
our fathers: who received the lively oracles to give unto us: To
whom our fathers would not obey, but thrust him from
them, and in their hearts turned back again into Egypt” (Acts
7:37-39, KJV).
What is interesting is how the King James Version translators
rendered ekklēsia as “church” in Acts 7:38, whereas most
other versions read “the congregation in the wilderness” (Acts
7:38, NASU; cf. NKJV, RSV, NRSV) or “assembly in the desert” (NIV).
This “wilderness church,” as we might call it, was Ancient
Israel.
The proper rendering of the word ekklēsia is dependent on
context. However, the very fact that ekklēsia can and
does mean in many places “an assembly of Israelites” should
instigate some thinking for your average Christian—and whether
or not “the Church” is an entity separate from Israel. The early
Believers understood ekklēsia as being connected to the
assembly of Israel. Why do Believers today largely miss out on
this?
Was the
Messiah starting something new?
A common defense for those claiming that “the Church” is an entity
separate from Israel is that Yeshua said “upon this rock I will
build My church” (Matthew 16:18). Notably, Roman Catholics
misinterpret this verse to support the non-Biblical doctrine of
unending papal secession through the Apostle Peter. Protestants,
following in this wake, often use the same verse to support the
fact that “the Church” was a “new” group of elect that started
at Pentecost. What was Yeshua really telling us? In its
entirety, the Messiah’s dialogue in Matthew 16:13-20 states,
“Now
when Jesus came into the district of Caesarea Philippi, He was
asking His disciples, ‘Who do people say that the Son of Man
is?’ And they said, ‘Some say John the Baptist; and
others, Elijah; but still others, Jeremiah, or one of the
prophets.’ He said to them, ‘But who do you say that I am?’
Simon Peter answered, ‘You are the Christ, the Son of the living
God.’ And Jesus said to him, ‘Blessed are you, Simon Barjona,
because flesh and blood did not reveal this to you, but
My Father who is in heaven. I also say to you that you are
Peter, and upon this rock I will build My church; and the gates
of Hades will not overpower it. I will give you the keys of the
kingdom of heaven; and whatever you bind on earth shall have
been bound in heaven, and whatever you loose on earth shall have
been loosed in heaven.’ Then He warned the disciples that they
should tell no one that He was the Christ”
(NASU).
In the verses, where Yeshua supposedly states that “the Church”
will begin with Peter, what Peter actually does is that he
confesses that Yeshua is indeed the Messiah. Yeshua confirms
this to him, and then says “on this rock I will build My
church.” Protestant expositors are agreed that the rock the
Messiah was talking about was Himself (cf. 2 Samuel 22:3), and
not Peter, a human being. But, they are sometimes not sure as to
what it means to “build.”
The Greek verb oikodomeō (oikodomew), most often translated as “build” in Matthew
16:18, can mean “to build.” However, it also means, “build up
again, restore,” most notably, “to help improve ability
to function in living responsibly and effectively,
strengthen, build up, make more able” (BDAG).[8]
AMG offers the definition “to rebuild or renew a building
decayed or destroyed.”[9]
With these definitions in mind, the question of whether or not “the
Church” is a new thing becomes easier to answer. Did Yeshua
establish something entirely new, or did He
strengthen/rebuild something already existent? And if it
already existed, what was it?
Considering the fact that a substantial amount of Christian
theology is focused around the entity known as “the Church,” it
would be logical to assume that there are prophecies in the
Tanach or Old Testament concerning its existence. While there
are prophecies such as Isaiah 53 speaking of Yeshua, the
Suffering Servant, foretelling His atoning work for us, we
should expect some similar treatment about the new body that God
would (supposedly) later establish as salvation went out
into the world. Sadly for those who believe that “the Church”
has been established as a second group of elect, there are no
such prophecies. On the contrary, all of the prophecies relating
to the Messiah regard His coming to restore Israel and bringing
Israel into its glory. Isaiah 49:5-6 is one such prophecy:
“And
now says the Lord, who formed Me from the womb to be His Servant, to bring
Jacob back to Him, so that Israel might be gathered to Him (For
I am honored in the sight of the
Lord, and My God is
My strength), He says, ‘It is too small a thing that You should
be My Servant to raise up the tribes of Jacob and to restore the
preserved ones of Israel; I will also make You a light of the
nations so that My salvation may reach to the end of the
earth.’”
This prophecy speaks of the Messiah restoring Israel, and as a
direct part of that restoration, God’s salvation will go out to
all nations and all the way to the ends of the Earth. The
elect in view is Israel, and not “the Church.” Interestingly
enough, while there are no explicit prophecies in the Tanach
speaking of the Messiah establishing a new assembly of elect,
“the Church,” Yeshua’s own words scarcely speak of such a
phenomenon, either. G.W. Bromiley comments in ISBE,
“In the teaching of Jesus Himself there is little mention of the
Church. The only two references in the Gospels are both in
Matthew (16:18: ‘On this rock I will build my church,’ and
18:17: ‘Tell it to the church’). In the second of these the
reference might be to the Jewish synagogue, though the general
context of Mt. 18 seems to suggest the emergent Christian
community. Apart from the critical questions raised by some
scholars, these verses give rise to many problems. For example,
do they denote the intention of Jesus to found a Church?”[10]
There are no prophecies that I can find which speak or allude to
the establishment of a second assembly of elect by the Messiah.
There are only those that speak of the restoration of Israel,
and Israel being used as God’s instrument or vehicle to bring
His salvation to the wider world. When you look at the
vocabulary of Matthew 16:18, it only confirms Yeshua’s mission
to restore Israel.
In Jeremiah 33:6-8 our Heavenly Father promises, “Behold,
I will bring to it health and healing, and I will heal them; and
I will reveal to them an abundance of peace and truth. I will
restore the fortunes of Judah and the fortunes of Israel and
will rebuild them as they were at first. I will cleanse them
from all their iniquity by which they have sinned against Me,
and I will pardon all their iniquities by which they have sinned
against Me and by which they have transgressed against Me.”
The critical promise here regarding Israel is that the Lord
“will rebuild them as they were before” (NIV). The Hebrew verb
rendered as “rebuild” in this passage is banah (hnB)
appearing in the Qal stem (simple action, active voice), which
in the Hebrew Scriptures can have several different
applications, including: “to build,” “to rebuild,”
“to work on a building,” or “to build a family” (HALOT).[11]
In the passage from Jeremiah “rebuild” is obviously the best
translation. The Greek Septuagint reflects this, rendering
banah with oikodomeō (oikodomew),
the same verb used in Matthew 16:18 speaking of Yeshua’s
establishing of “the Church”:
“I also say to you that you are Peter, and upon this rock I will
build [oikodomeō] My church; and the gates of Hades will
not overpower it.”[12]
What actually
occurred at Pentecost?
Within evangelical Christianity, it is usually taught that “the
Church” entity was born at Pentecost. The Scriptures do plainly
attest, “that
day there were added about three thousand souls” (Acts 2:41). Pentecost is in actuality
the appointed time of Shavuot (tA[bv),
specified in Leviticus 23:15-22. In Jewish theology, it is the
day when the Torah or the Law was given to the people of Israel.
This happened almost 1,300 years prior to the Holy Spirit being
poured out at the Upper Room, a time when “three thousand men of
the people fell” (Exodus 32:28b) because of worshipping the
golden calf. On the Pentecost or Shavuot following
Yeshua’s ascension into Heaven, the Apostle Peter delivered a
riveting message to those assembled:
“Men
of Israel, listen to these words: Yeshua the Nazarene, a man
attested to you by God with miracles and wonders and signs which
God performed through Him in your midst, just as you yourselves
know—this Man, delivered over by the predetermined plan
and foreknowledge of God, you nailed to a cross by the hands of
godless men and put Him to death…Therefore let all the
house of Israel know for certain that God has made Him both Lord
and Messiah—this Yeshua whom you crucified”
(Acts 2:22-23, 36).
The Book of Acts tells us that on this Shavuot, people
believing in the God of Israel from all over the known world
came to gather in Jerusalem, both those who were observant Jews
and proselytes (Acts 2:9-11). Peter did not proclaim to the
crowds amassed “We’re starting the Church!” Rather, he
proclaimed that Yeshua was both “Lord and Messiah” (Acts 2:36).
Peter proclaimed that He was the promised Messiah of Israel and
that the people were to “Repent,
and each of you be baptized in the name of Yeshua the Messiah
for the forgiveness of your sins; and you will receive the gift
of the Holy Spirit. For the promise is for you and your children
and for all who are far off, as many as the Lord our God will
call to Himself”
(Acts 2:38-39). Peter explained that what occurred on this day
was prophesied by Joel:
“[B]ut
this is what was spoken of through the prophet Joel: ‘And
it shall be in the last days,’ God says, ‘That
I will pour forth of My spirit on all mankind; and your sons and
your daughters shall prophesy, and your young men shall see
visions, and your old men shall dream dreams; even on My
bondslaves, both men and women, I will in those days pour forth
of My Spirit and they shall prophesy.
And I will grant wonders in the sky above and signs on the earth
below, blood, and fire, and vapor of smoke. The sun will be
turned into darkness and the moon into blood, before the great
and glorious day of the Lord shall come. And it shall be that
everyone who calls on the name of the Lord will be saved’” (Acts 2:16-21; cf. Joel 2:28-32).
Pentecost, or this Shavuot, did not initiate something new,
but rather it fulfilled various prophecies of Joel and it was
when the good news of Messiah Yeshua was presented to those
gathered in Jerusalem. The Holy Spirit was poured out as was
foretold by Yeshua (Acts 1:8), with three thousand coming to
faith in Him. This paralleled the three thousand who were killed
following the first Shavout some 1,300 years earlier.
A Challenge to
Christians
If you were to ask any sincere Christian what the purpose of our
faith is, he or she would probably tell you that it is to go out
and fulfill the Great Commission given to us in Matthew
28:19-20: “Go
therefore and make disciples of all the nations, baptizing them
in the name of the Father and the Son and the Holy Spirit,
teaching them to observe all that I commanded you; and lo, I am
with you always, even to the end of the age.”
The individual would be correct; we are commanded by Yeshua to
go out and proclaim salvation and repentance in His name, and
disciple others in His teachings. Although much of Christianity
sees itself as separate from Israel, Christian Believers will
actually (and often unknowingly) identify their purpose as being
the same as Israel’s: to be a light to the nations,
representatives of God’s Kingdom on Earth. Little do they
realize that the ekklēsia, the true called out assembly
of Believers, is Israel.
Before His ascension into Heaven, the Disciples asked Yeshua, “Lord,
is it at this time You are restoring the kingdom to Israel?”
(Acts 1:6). From what is recorded after the Messiah ascended,
two angels told them, “Men
of Galilee, why do you stand looking into the sky? This Yeshua,
who has been taken up from you into heaven, will come in just
the same way as you have watched Him go into heaven” (Acts 1:11). The Disciples’ question regarding Israel’s
restoration was not really answered (Acts 1:7), so they went and
proclaimed the good news of Yeshua’s death, burial, and
resurrection to those “in
all Judea and Samaria, and even to the remotest part of the
earth” (Acts 1:8), as they were commanded to do. The Book of
Acts and Apostolic letters give us ample testimony to their
great deeds.
Was this going out to proclaim the good news the beginning of
something new, as in an entity known as “the Church”? Not at
all. We know this because Yeshua came to restore the Kingdom to
Israel. Israel is the conduit by which all the world can be
blessed. Israel is supposed to be a light to the nations, so
that the world might know that the God of Israel is the One True
God.
Throughout the Scriptures, our Lord Yeshua is called the light of
the world (John 1:9; 3:19; 8:12; 9:5; 11:9; 12:46). Notably, He
is also called the light of Israel (Isaiah 10:17)—but nowhere in
the Bible is Yeshua the Messiah called “the light of the
Church.” There is no separate group of elect outside of Israel.
If you are born again, you are part of the Commonwealth of
Israel (Ephesians 2:11-12). Paul describes how, with the coming
of Yeshua, “the Israel of God” (Galatians 6:16) forms a “one new
humanity” (Ephesians 2:15, NRSV/CJB), specifically where
non-Jewish Believers are “fellow heirs” (Ephesians 3:6) along
with Jewish Believers.
For many centuries the Christian Church has helped bring millions
of people into a relationship with the Messiah Yeshua (Christ
Jesus). Today’s Messianic Believers certainly do have a rich
theological and spiritual heritage from Christianity.[13]
Yet our days present new challenges, and many Christians are
searching for more. With the advent of the Messianic movement,
we have witnessed a generation of Jewish people having come to
saving faith in Messiah Yeshua. Along with this, many non-Jewish
Believers have been asking questions about their Hebraic Roots,
and are not seeing themselves as being separate from Israel any
more. They want to know what to do. What do any of us do when
confronted with the reality that Believers are a part of the
people that will reign with Yeshua from Jerusalem?
If Yeshua indeed came to restore Israel, and not create a new
“Church,” should this not change the understanding of our call
and/or mission as a part of our Heavenly Father’s “called out”
people of Israel? If we are not separate from, but are instead a
part of Israel, should this not cause us—at the very least—to
rethink our relationship to Jews who have yet to know Yeshua,
and the Hebraic origins of our faith? Should we not consider the
Jewish people as a part of our spiritual family who need to know
Yeshua, the Savior of all Israel?
Moreover, as a part of Israel, should we not rethink the concept
embraced by many who think they are part of “the Church,” which
is that the Messiah will “rapture the Church at any moment,” so
that the God of Israel can deal with “Israel” during the
Tribulation period? Even more so, should we not start looking at
the whole Bible as being for us, rather than splitting it up
between Israel and “the Church” because of some false teachings
promulgated by dispensationalism?[14]
Certainly, we all have much to think and pray about.
J.K. McKee (B.A., University of Oklahoma; M.A., Asbury
Theological Seminary) is the editor of TNN Online (www.tnnonline.net)
and is a Messianic apologist. He is author of several books,
including: The New Testament Validates Torah, Torah In the
Balance, Volume I, and When Will the Messiah Return?.
He has also written many articles on the Two Houses of Israel
and Biblical theology, and is presently focusing on Messianic
commentaries on various books of the Bible.
NOTES
[1]
This article has been reproduced from the paperback
edition of
Introduction to Things Messianic,
pp 15-23.
[2]
Tim LaHaye, Rapture Under Attack
(Sisters, OR: Multnomah Publishers, 1998), 229.
[3]
See also: Deuteronomy 7:6; 10:15; Exodus
19:6; Isaiah 61:6; 43:21; Deuteronomy 4:20; 14:2.
[4]
BDAG, 303.
[5]
Ibid.
[6]
Francis Brown, S.R. Driver, and Charles
A. Briggs, Hebrew and English Lexicon of the Old
Testament (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1979), 874.
[7]
Cf. Jack P. Lewis, “qāhāl,” in TWOT,
2:790.
[8]
BDAG, 696.
[9]
Spiros Zodhiates, ed., Complete Word
Study Dictionary: New Testament (Chattanooga: AMG
Publishers, 1993), 1030.
[10]
G.W. Bromiley, “Church,” in Geoffrey
Bromiley, ed., International Standard Bible
Encyclopedia, 4 vols. (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans,
1988), 1:693.
[11]
Ludwig Koehler and Walter Baumgartner,
eds., The Hebrew & Aramaic Lexicon of the Old
Testament, 2 vols. (Leiden, the Netherlands: Brill,
2001), 1:139.
[12]
Note how the future tense oikodomēsō
(oikodomhsw),
“will (re)build,” is employed in both Jeremiah 33:6-8 (LXX)
and Matthew 16:18; cf. Peter T. O’Brien, Pillar New
Testament Commentary: The Letter to the Ephesians
(Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1999), pp 304-305.
[13]
Do note how our ministry has
consistently spoken against much of the
anti-Christian rhetoric present in various sectors of
the Messianic community. Obviously as Messianics we do
have some disagreements with mainstream Christianity,
but we also have much more in common with our
Christian brethren (Ephesians 4:1-6).
[14]
Consult the author’s article “Dispensationalism:
Root Cause of Antinomianism.”
|